|
Published by
the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Vol. 22 No. 10
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
WSSD PREPCOM II HIGHLIGHTS:
MONDAY, 28 JANUARY 2002
The second preparatory committee (PrepCom
II) for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) opened at
the UN Headquarters in New York on Monday, 28 January 2002.
Delegates, representatives from major groups and observers met in
Plenary all day to hear opening statements, adopt the agenda and
organization of work, accredit organizations, and begin a
comprehensive review and assessment of progress achieved in the
implementation of Agenda 21 and other outcomes of the UNCED, as well
as of the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21.
OPENING PLENARY
PrepCom Chair Emil Salim
(Indonesia) opened the session at 10:25 am and emphasized:
encouraging meaningful and substantial preparations for WSSD in
order to attract the attention of world leaders; integrating all
three pillars – economic, environmental and social – in
discussions of sustainable development; ensuring major group
participation; meeting new challenges such as globalization; and
overcoming environmental, political and economic crises through the
WSSD process.
Chair Salim then introduced, and
delegates adopted, the agenda (E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/1) and organization
of work (E/CN.17/2002/ PC.2/1/Add.1).
ACCREDITATION OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS AND NGOS
Chair Salim presented, and
delegates accredited, intergovernmental organizations, namely:
European Space Agency; International Energy Agency; Mines Ministries
of the Americas Conference; North American Commission for
Environmental Cooperation; Standing Committee of Parliamentarians of
the Arctic Region; Nordic Council of Ministers; Consultative Group
for International Agricultural Research; and the Intergovernmental
Forum on Chemical Safety. Delegates also accredited a number of NGOs
and other major groups, except the International Campaign for Tibet,
whose accreditation is pending the outcome of informal
consultations.
REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS
IN AGENDA 21 IMPLEMENTATION
Chair Salim invited delegates to
consider the agenda item on the comprehensive review of progress
achieved in implementation of Agenda 21 and other Rio outcomes,
which consisted of the Secretary-General’s report, nine
presentations on the results of intergovernmental meetings and
processes, and results of regional preparatory meetings.
REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL:
Nitin Desai, Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social
Affairs, introduced the Secretary-General’s report on implementing
Agenda 21 (E/CN.17/ 2002/PC.2/7) and enumerated achievements since
Rio, including: increased environmental awareness; establishment of
principles such as common but differentiated responsibilities and
the precautionary principle; acceptance that addressing human
deprivation is a global responsibility; and changes in the corporate
sector’s approach to sustainability. Highlighting challenges in
the WSSD process, he called for, inter alia, establishing
partnerships and reasserting high-level political commitment, which
should be achieved through practical steps.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS AND
PROCESSES: GERMANY presented the results
of the International Conference on Freshwater
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/10), held in Bonn, Germany, from 3-7 December
2001, and highlighted Conference recommendations directed to the
WSSD. ICELAND presented two reports: the first on the Reykjavík
Conference on Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/3), held on 1-4 October 2001; and the second on
the results of the Intergovernmental Review Meeting on the
Implementation of the Global Programme of Action for the Protection
of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities (E/
CN.17/2002/PC.2/15), held in Montréal, Canada, on 26-30 November
2001. CANADA presented the report of the International Pollution
Prevention Summit (E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/2), which was also held in
Montréal, Canada, on 18-20 October 2001, and elaborated on
substantive outcomes that include creation of a Global Information
Network and action plans.
The Secretariat of the UN
Convention to Combat Desertification presented a report issued by
the Fifth Conference of the Parties to the Convention
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/11) held from 2-13 October 2001 in Geneva,
Switzerland, which contains conclusions and recommendations on
future steps in the implementation of the Convention, and a
political statement addressing the poverty and environment nexus.
The Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
presented the Marrakesh ministerial declaration, issued by
the Seventh Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (E/CN.17/
2002/PC.2/4), held in Marrakesh, Morocco, from 29 October to 9
November 2001.
UNESCO presented the resolution of
the Executive Council of the International Oceanographic Commission
(IOC) of UNESCO that was convened on 10-11 December 2001
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/Misc.1). It outlines the IOC’s commitments. He
also discussed the deliberations and outcomes of the Global
Conference on Oceans and Coasts at Rio+10, held in Paris, France,
from 3-7 December 2001, which represents its input toward Chapter 17
of Agenda 21.
UNEP Executive Director Klaus
Töpfer presented a progress report on international environmental
governance (IEG), noting that five meetings had taken place, with
the last scheduled for 12 February 2002 in Cartagena, Colombia. He
described UNEP’s inputs toward WSSD, and said that the decision on
IEG by the Seventh Special Session of the UNEP Governing Council
scheduled for 13-15 February 2002 in Cartagena will be reported to
WSSD PrepCom III.
AUSTRIA presented reports of the
first and second Global Forums on Sustainable Energy
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/14). The first Forum was held in December 2000
and addressed issues pertinent to energy for sustainable
development, while the second, held in October 2001, addressed
energy technologies for rural development.
RESULTS OF REGIONAL PREPARATORY
COMMITTEES: In the afternoon Plenary,
Chair Salim invited delegates to consider the results of the
preparations in the five UN regions, as well as of the interregional
preparatory meeting of small island developing states (SIDS)
(E/CN.17/2002/PC.2/5/Add.1-6).
Switzerland, speaking on behalf of
the UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE (UNECE), reviewed the outcome
of the regional preparatory meeting held in Geneva on 24-25
September 2001. He stressed that the ministerial statement set a
common regional platform that went beyond the targets set in Rio and
that poverty eradication was identified as a central theme. He said
the other priorities included exploring innovative sources of
financing, ensuring sustainable management of natural resources,
making globalization work for sustainable development, changing
patterns of consumption and production, providing good governance
and improving the institutional framework for sustainable
development.
On behalf of the AFRICAN REGION,
Zambia presented the results of the African preparatory conference
held in Nairobi on 17-18 October 2001. He reviewed elements of the
ministerial statement, such as the industrial decline and
marginalization of Africa, the negative effects of globalization,
HIV/AIDS, the need to remove obstacles to developing country exports
and to ensure resource flows to Africa, debt reduction/cancellation,
access to safe water, and education. The major limiting factor in
implementing Agenda 21, he said, was the lack of resources for
implementation, that is, financing for development. He suggested
that the vision for Johannesburg be a statement of time-bound action
with indicators of performance.
Yemen, on behalf of the WEST ASIA
REGION, reviewed the processes that led to the Arab Declaration to
the WSSD, which highlights achievements, including reduced
illiteracy and the establishment of the Greater Arab Free Trade
Zone. He identified remaining challenges to be addressed at WSSD,
such as: escalating poverty and population; a strengthened private
sector role; women’s education; the attainment of World Trade
Organization objectives and market access for developing country
exports; instability from the lack of peace and security in the
region; research on technology transfer; implementation of the
Biosafety Protocol of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
for research on effects of genetically modified organisms; provision
of finance for sustainable development; and a regular review of the
attainment of sustainability objectives.
Brazil, on behalf of the LATIN
AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGION, highlighted: subregional meetings;
the influence of the Global Conference on the Sustainable
Development of SIDS held in Barbados in 1994; regional vulnerability
to natural disasters; and the need for early warning systems,
technology transfer and implementation of Rio agreements. He
identified sustainable development issues to be addressed at WSSD,
including negative impacts of globalization, involvement of civil
society, financing for sustainable development and meeting targets
for offficial development assistance, ODA. He called for
ratification of the CBD and the Kyoto Protocol and for sustainable
development of mountain ecosystems, and proposed that the WSSD theme
be "towards a new globalization that ensures that development
is sustainable, equitable and inclusive."
Singapore, on behalf of SMALL
ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES (SIDS), reported on the meeting of the
Alliance of Small Island States, that covered topics including: the
outcomes of the regional preparatory meetings; capacity building
needs; the role of civil society; adaptations to climate change; and
the Barbados Programme of Action.
During discussion of the reports
of the regional preparatory meetings, Spain, on behalf of the
EUROPEAN UNION (EU), supported the UNECE priorities and assured
delegates that the EU was ready to play a prominent role in
preparation for Johannesburg. He noted similarities between the
meetings, including the need for an inclusive participatory process
with common but differentiated responsibilities, the protection of
natural resources and the need to change patterns of consumption and
production. He identified potential themes for the Summit, including
poverty eradication, globalization for sustainable development,
strengthened governance, and finance for partnerships. JAPAN
expressed support for the Asia Pacific regional report, and detailed
priorities related to science and innovative technologies to be
reflected in the Johannesburg outcomes. The ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMISSION OF ASIA AND PACIFIC and SURINAME also made statements in
support of their respective regional groups.
IN THE CORRIDORS
PrepCom II started inauspiciously
on Monday, 28 January, as disappointed delegates realized that the
session was definitely not going to be a negotiating one. Some spent
their day in regional or like-minded groups consolidating positions
on the Secretary-General�s report and preparing input for the
Chairman�s text, which is expected to be presented toward the end
of the second week and will form the basis for negotiations at
PrepCom III.
Activity among NGOs was more
upbeat, however, as discussion was underway regarding the
possibility of calling for a treaty on corporate responsibility as
one of the Summit�s outputs. Those preparing for the
Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues, scheduled to start Tuesday afternoon,
were less enthusiastic. They expressed frustration at the lack of
clarity about how nine sectors would effectively share three-hour
dialogue sessions with governments � which would supposedly lead
to real partnerships by the end of WSSD � especially after last
year�s dialogues were poorly attended by governments. Others were
frustrated at the lack of coordination among NGOs, which was
attributed in part to the break-up of the CSD steering committee in
May 2001 during PrepCom I.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
PLENARY:
Delegates will meet from 10:00 am � 1:00 pm in Conference Room 1
to hear inputs from Executive Heads of UN Agencies, financial
institutions and Convention Secretariats, and reconvene from 3:00
� 6:00 pm in the General Assembly Hall for the first Plenary of
the Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue Segment, which will address overall
progress achieved in the implementation of Agenda 21.
|