Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development
(IISD)
Vol. 19 No. 13
Tuesday, 16 October 2001
THE 13th MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE MONTREAL
PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES
THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER
16-19 OCTOBER 2001
The 13th Meeting of the Parties
(MOP-13) to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone
Layer opens today at the Bandaranaike Memorial International Conference
Hall in Colombo, Sri Lanka. A preparatory segment will take place from
16-17 October, followed by a high-level segment from 18-19 October.
During the preparatory segment,
delegates will consider issues and draft decisions regarding: the terms
of reference (TOR) for the study on the 2003-2005 replenishment of the
Multilateral Fund; a proposal for an evaluation of the financial
mechanism of the Montreal Protocol; the review of the
fixed-exchange-rate mechanism and the impact of the mechanism on the
Multilateral Fund and on funding for the phase out of ozone-depleting
substances (ODS) in Article 5 Parties (developing countries) for the
triennium 2000-2002; the phase-out schedule of hydrochlorofluorocarbons
(HCFCs) in Article 5 Parties; information on new ODS; criteria for
assessing the ozone-depleting potential of new chemicals; essential-use
exemption applications; industrial rationalization; production of
chloroflurocarbons (CFCs) for metered dose inhalers (MDIs); assessment
of the future need for halons for essential uses; monitoring of
international trade and prevention of illegal trade in ODS and mixtures
and products containing ODS; and reducing emissions of controlled
substances from process-agent uses. Other items on the agenda include
the reporting of data by Parties, compliance issues considered by the
Implementation Committee, the financial statement and budget for the
Trust Fund for the Protocol, and the selection of members of the
Implementation Committee and the Executive Committee of the Multilateral
Fund, and the Co-Chairs of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG).
A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE OZONE REGIME
Concerns that the Earth's
stratospheric ozone layer could be at risk from CFCs and other
anthropogenic substances were first raised during the early to
mid-1970s. At that time, scientists warned that the release of CFCs and
other substances into the atmosphere could deplete the ozone layer, thus
hindering its ability to prevent harmful ultraviolet rays from reaching
the Earth. This would adversely affect ocean ecosystems, agricultural
productivity and animal populations, as well as harm humans by causing
higher rates of skin cancer and weakened immune systems. In response to
this growing concern, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
convened a conference of experts from 32 countries in March 1977. This
conference adopted a World Plan of Action on the Ozone Layer and
established a Coordinating Committee to determine the extent of the
problem as a guide for future international action.
VIENNA CONVENTION: In
May 1981, the UNEP Governing Council launched negotiations on an
international agreement to protect the ozone layer. The Ad Hoc
Working Group of Legal and Technical Experts for the Elaboration of a
Global Framework Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, which
included representatives from 24 nations, began meeting in 1982. Their
work resulted in the adoption of the Vienna Convention for the
Protection of the Ozone Layer in March 1985. The Convention established
the need to cooperate on monitoring, research and data exchanges.
However, it did not impose specific obligations to reduce production or
consumption of ODS nor specify what substances cause ozone depletion. To
date, the Convention has 181 Parties.
MONTREAL PROTOCOL: Efforts
to negotiate binding country obligations and identify ODS continued in
1986, leading to the adoption of the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer on 16 September 1987. To date, the Protocol
has 180 Parties. Under the Protocol, governments recognized the need to
control CFC production and consumption. Developed countries (non-Article
5 Parties) pledged to reduce production and consumption of CFCs by 50%
of 1986 levels by 1999 and to freeze production and consumption of
halons at 1986 levels. Developing countries (Article 5 Parties) were
granted a grace period allowing them to increase their use of these ODS
before taking on commitments.
LONDON AMENDMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS: Further
scientific evidence – including increasing information about the ozone
hole over Antarctica and evidence of reductions in the ozone layer over
the northern hemisphere – gave fresh impetus to negotiations and the
regime-building process. Delegates to MOP-2, which took place in London
in June 1990, agreed to amend and adjust the Protocol to include other
ODS and accelerate existing phase-out timetables. The London Amendment
added ten more CFCs to the list of ODS, as well as carbon tetrachloride
and methyl chloroform, which were to be phased out by developed and
developing countries by 2000 and 2005, respectively. The adjustment
required developed countries to phase out CFCs and halons by 2000. To
date, 153 Parties have ratified the London Amendment.
In addition, MOP-2 established the
Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol, the
first of its kind under an environmental agreement. The Fund meets the
incremental costs of developing country implementation of the Protocol's
control measures and finances all clearing-house functions, including
technical assistance, information, training and costs of the Fund
Secretariat. The Fund is administered by an Executive Committee, which
is comprised of seven donor and seven recipient countries. Its finances
are replenished every three years.
COPENHAGEN AMENDMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS: MOP-4
took place in Copenhagen in 1992. Delegates agreed to enact
non-compliance procedures and shorten the existing control schedule, so
that developed countries would phase out CFCs, carbon tetrachloride and
methyl chloroform by 1996, and halons by 1994. They also added methyl
bromide, hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons
(HCFCs) to the list of controlled ODS. For developed countries,
production and consumption of methyl bromide was to be frozen at 1991
levels, HBFCs were to be phased out by 1996 and consumption of HCFCs was
to be phased out by 2030, with a 99.5% cut to be achieved by 2020. The
Copenhagen Amendment also enacted stronger import and export controls.
To date, 128 Parties have ratified the Copenhagen Amendment.
VIENNA ADJUSTMENTS: At
MOP-7, held in Vienna in December 1995, developing countries agreed to
phase out HBFCs by 1996, to freeze their production and consumption of
methyl bromide in 2002 at average 1995-1998 levels, and to freeze their
consumption of HCFCs in 2016, leading to a phase out by 2040. The Vienna
Adjustments also tightened the developed country commitments by
adjusting the baseline for the HCFC target and setting a phase-out date
of 2010 for methyl bromide.
MONTREAL AMENDMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS: At
MOP-9, held in Montreal in September 1997, developed countries agreed to
move forward the phase out of methyl bromide to 2005, while developing
countries agreed to a phase out by 2015. Delegates also agreed to a new
licensing system for controlling illegal trade in ODS based on licenses
issued by Parties for each import and export, and on regular information
exchanges between Parties. The aim of this licensing system was to
enable customs officials and police to track trade in CFCs and detect
illegal trade. To date, 63 Parties have ratified the Montreal Amendment.
BEIJING AMENDMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS:
MOP-11 and the Fifth Conference of the Parties (COP-5) to the Vienna
Convention met jointly in Beijing, China, from 29 November-3 December
1999. MOP-11 resulted in the adoption of the Beijing Amendment and
Adjustments. The Beijing Amendment provides for: a freeze in the level
of HCFC production in 2004 for developed countries and in 2016 for
developing countries; the phase out of bromochloromethane by 2002; a ban
on trade in HCFCs with non-Parties from 2004; and reporting on annual
consumption of methyl bromide for quarantine and pre-shipment
applications. To date, eleven Parties have ratified the Beijing
Amendment, and it has yet to enter into force. The Amendment will enter
into force 90 days after 20 Parties have ratified it. The adjustments
stipulate the phase out of production allowances to meet the basic
domestic needs of developing countries for CFCs, halons and methyl
bromide. In addition, MOP-11/COP-5 adopted the Beijing Declaration and
decided on the replenishment of the Multilateral Fund with US$477.7
million for 2000-2002.
MOP-12: MOP-12
took place in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, from 11-14 December 2000.
MOP-12 adopted decisions on, inter alia, a correction to the
Beijing Adjustments; measures to facilitate the transition from
CFC-based MDIs; disposal of controlled substances; essential-use
exemption applications; and monitoring of international trade and
prevention of illegal trade in ODS and ODS-containing mixtures and
products. MOP-12 also considered but did not adopt decisions on the use
of HCFCs by Article 5 Parties, process agents and new ODS, specifically
information on hexachlorobutadiene.
MOP-12 adopted the Ouagadougou
Declaration, which encouraged Parties to, inter alia: take steps
to prevent illegal production and consumption and trade in ODS and
equipment and products containing them; cooperate on transfer of
technology, know-how and capacity building, and harmonization of customs
codes; integrate ozone layer protection into socioeconomic development
programmes; and adopt and apply regulations and pursue awareness-raising
campaigns for all stakeholders who use ODS.
INTERSESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
21ST MEETING OF THE OPEN-ENDED WORKING
GROUP: The 21st Meeting of the OEWG took place
from 24-26 July 2001 in Montreal. Delegates to OEWG-21 considered the
reports of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) and
Scientific Assessment Panel (SAP). The OEWG also addressed a number of
topics in preparation for MOP-13, including: the TOR for the
Multilateral Fund replenishment study; new ODS; international trade and
prevention of illegal trade in ODS and mixtures and products containing
ODS; the review of the fixed-exchange-rate mechanism; and the HCFC
phase-out schedule for Article 5 Parties.
33RD AND 34TH MEETINGS OF THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE MULTILATERAL FUND: The
33rd and 34th meetings of the Executive Committee of the Multilateral
Fund took place in Montreal from 28-30 March 2001 and from 18-20 July
2001, respectively. The Committee considered a number of issues,
including: the status of contributions and disbursements; the
achievements of the Fund; the status of Article 5 country compliance
with the Protocol's initial control measures; strategic planning for the
Multilateral Fund for 2000-2002; and actions taken to improve the Fund.
The Committee will report to MOP-13 later this week.
27TH MEETING OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
COMMITTEE: The 27th meeting of the
Implementation Committee took place on 13 October 2001 in Colombo. The
Committee discussed the Secretariat's report on data provided by Parties
on their production and consumption of ODS, and agreed to forward
several draft decisions to MOP-13. The Implementation Committee
considered: cases where data has not been provided; requests to Parties
that may be out of compliance to provide further information; steps to
be taken by Parties not in compliance; and the situation of Parties that
were out of compliance, but are now in compliance. MOP-13 will consider
draft decisions forwarded by the Committee later this week.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
OPENING PLENARY: MOP-13
will open at 10:00 am at the Bandaranaike Memorial International
Conference Hall. Following cultural performances, Sri Lankan Minister of
Transport and Environment Dinesh Gunewardana and Ozone Secretariat
Deputy Executive Secretary Michael Graber will deliver opening remarks.
After adopting the agenda, delegates will consider the TOR for the
Multilateral Fund replenishment study, hear a report from the Treasurer
on the review of the fixed-exchange-rate mechanism's implementation, and
consider the proposal for the evaluation of the financial mechanism.
|