|
|
PDF Format
|
Text Format
|
Spanish Version
|
French Version
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published by the
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Vol. 15 No. 125
Tuesday, 27 September 2005
SECOND MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE
PARTIES TO THE ROTTERDAM CONVENTION ON THE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT
PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AND PESTICIDES IN
INTERNATIONAL TRADE:
27-30 SEPTEMBER 2005
The second meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam
Convention on the Prior Informed Consent procedure for Certain Hazardous
Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (PIC COP-2), begins
today and continues through 30 September 2005, in Rome, Italy.
The Rotterdam Convention was adopted in September 1998, entered into
force in February 2004, and has now been ratified by 100 parties. Its
prior informed consent (PIC) procedure aims to promote shared
responsibility between exporting and importing countries in protecting
human health and the environment from the harmful effects of certain
hazardous chemicals that are traded internationally. It facilitates
information exchange about their characteristics, provides for a
national decision-making process on their import and export, and
disseminates these decisions to parties. The PIC procedure applies to 41
banned or severely restricted chemicals and severely hazardous pesticide
formulations listed in the Rotterdam Convention’s Annex III, among which
are 24 pesticides, 11 industrial chemicals, and six severely hazardous
pesticide formulations.
At COP-2, delegates will discuss the adoption of the programme of work
and the budget for 2006, non-compliance, financial mechanisms to enable
developing countries to implement adequately the provisions of the
Convention, and technical assistance. Other issues to be discussed
include: operational procedures of the Chemical Review Committee; the
finalization of the arrangements between the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) for the provision of the
secretariat to the Rotterdam Convention; and cooperation and synergies
between the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions’ secretariats.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ROTTERDAM CONVENTION
Growth in internationally-traded chemicals
during the 1960s and 1970s prompted efforts by the international
community to safeguard people and the environment from the harmful
effects of such chemicals. These efforts resulted in the adoption of the
International Code of Conduct for the Distribution and Use of Pesticides
by FAO and the London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on
Chemicals in International Trade by UNEP. Both the Code of Conduct and
the London Guidelines included procedures aimed at making information
about hazardous chemicals readily available, thereby permitting
countries to assess the risks associated with their use. In 1989, both
instruments were amended to include a voluntary PIC procedure, managed
jointly by FAO and UNEP, to help countries make informed decisions on
the import of banned or severely restricted chemicals.
At the UN Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de
Janeiro in 1992, delegates adopted Agenda 21, which contains an
international strategy for action on chemical safety (Chapter 19) and
calls on States to achieve full participation in and implementation of
the PIC procedure by 2000, and the possible adoption of a
legally-binding PIC Convention.
In November 1994, the 107th meeting of the FAO Council agreed that the
FAO Secretariat should proceed with the preparation of a draft PIC
Convention as part of the joint FAO/UNEP programme. In May 1995, the
18th session of the UNEP Governing Council adopted Decision 18/12,
authorizing the Executive Director to convene, with FAO, an
intergovernmental negotiating committee (INC) with a mandate to prepare
an international legally-binding instrument for the application of the
PIC procedure.
NEGOTIATION OF THE CONVENTION: The INC held five sessions between
March 1996 and March 1998 during which a draft of the PIC Convention was
produced, revised, and ultimately agreed upon, as well as a draft
resolution on interim arrangements.
CONFERENCE OF PLENIPOTENTIARIES: The Conference of
Plenipotentiaries of the PIC Convention was held from 10-11 September
1998, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ministers and senior officials from
nearly 100 countries adopted the Rotterdam Convention, the Final Act of
the Conference, and a Resolution on Interim Arrangements.
In line with the new procedures contained in the Convention, the
Conference adopted numerous interim arrangements for the continued
implementation of the voluntary PIC procedure and invited UNEP and FAO
to convene further INCs during the period prior to the Convention’s
entry into force and to oversee the operation of the interim PIC
procedure.
INC-6 to 11: INC-6, held in Rome from 12-16 July 1999, agreed to
draft decisions on the definition and provisional adoption of the PIC
regions, the establishment of an Interim Chemical Review Committee (ICRC),
and the adoption of draft decision guidance documents (DGDs) for
chemicals already identified for inclusion in the PIC procedure.
INC-7 was held in Geneva from 30 October to 3 November 2000, and
addressed the implementation of the PIC procedure, preparations for the
COP, including financial arrangements, and agreed to add ethylene
dichloride and ethylene oxide to the PIC procedure.
INC-8 was held in Rome from 8-12 October 2001, and resolved a number of
questions associated with the discontinuation of the PIC procedure and
on conflict of interest of ICRC members.
INC-9 was held in Bonn, Germany, from 30 September to 4 October 2002. It
agreed on the inclusion of monocrotophos in the PIC procedure, and made
progress on financial rules and dispute settlement procedures.
INC-10 was held in Geneva from 17-21 November 2003, and agreed to add
four forms of asbestos, DNOC, and dustable powder formulations of
benomyl, carbofuran and thiram (formerly referred to as Granox T and
Spinox TBC) to the interim PIC procedure, but deferred to the next
meeting a decision on including a fifth form of asbestos, chrysotile.
INC-11 was held in Geneva on 18-19 September 2004, and agreed to add
tetraethyl lead, tetramethyl lead, and parathion to the PIC procedure,
but did not reach consensus on the addition of chrysotile asbestos.
ICRC-1 to 5: The first session of the ICRC took place in Geneva
from 21-25 February 2000, and agreed to recommend ethylene dichloride
and ethylene oxide for inclusion in the PIC procedure. ICRC-2 was held
in Rome from 19-23 March 2001, and addressed the inclusion of
monocrotophos in the PIC procedure. ICRC-3 was held in Geneva from 17-21
February 2002, and recommended the addition of monocrotophos, Granox TBC
and Spinox T, DNOC, and five forms of asbestos to the PIC procedure.
ICRC-4 was held in Rome from 3-7 March 2003, and addressed new candidate
chemicals for inclusion in the PIC procedure, as well as notifications
of final regulatory actions to ban or severely restrict parathion,
tetraethyl lead, tetramethyl lead, and tributyl tin compounds.
ICRC-5 was held in Geneva from 2-6 February 2004, and discussed
notifications of final regulatory action to ban or severely restrict
dimefox, endrin, endosulfan, mevinphos, and vinclozolin; but decided not
to recommend any of the five chemicals for inclusion in the interim PIC
procedure, since the notifications did not meet all the criteria listed
in Annex II. The ICRC recommended the inclusion of tetraethyl lead,
tetramethyl lead, and parathion for inclusion in the PIC procedure.
COP-1: The first COP to the
Rotterdam Convention, held in Geneva on 20-24 September 2004, adopted
all the decisions required to make the legally-binding PIC procedure
operational. Delegates addressed procedural issues and other decisions
associated with the entry into force of the Convention, such as the:
composition of the PIC regions; inclusion of chemicals in Annex III
recommended during the interim period; adoption of financial rules and
provisions for the COP, the subsidiary bodies, and the Secretariat;
establishment of the Chemical Review Committee (CRC); cooperation with
the World Trade Organization; settlement of disputes; and the location
of the Secretariat.
INTERSESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
SAICM PREPCOM-2: The second session
of the Preparatory Committee for the Development of the Strategic
Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM PrepCom-2) was
held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 4-8 October 2004. PrepCom-2 discussed
elements of an overarching policy strategy for international chemicals
management, made progress in creating a matrix of possible concrete
measures of a global plan of action to promote chemical safety, and
provided comments on an initial list of elements to be included in a
high-level political declaration.
BASEL COP-7: COP-7 of the Basel
Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes
and their Disposal was held in Geneva from 25-29 October 2004, and
considered inter alia: the Basel Convention Regional Centers, the Basel
Convention Partnership Programme, the Ban Amendment, and the Basel
Protocol on Liability and Compensation.
CRC-1: The first meeting of the CRC, held in Geneva from 11-18
February 2005, considered notifications on 14 candidate chemicals for
inclusion in Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention. The CRC decided to
recommend to COP the inclusion of chrysotile asbestos in Annex III and
agreed on a schedule to prepare the corresponding DGDs. In addition, it
considered a number of working procedures and policy guidance, and
raised issues for consideration by COP such as the difference between
risk evaluation requirements conducted under different international
bodies, possible confusion between trade names and brand names, the
meaning of the term �severely restricted,� and the consideration of
additional information.
POPs COP-1: The first COP to the Stockholm Convention on
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), held from 2-6 May 2005, in Punta
del Este, Uruguay, adopted a range of decisions required to set the POPs
Convention�s implementation in motion. These decisions relate to: the
evaluation of the continued need for DDT use for disease vector control;
guidance for the financial mechanism; a schedule for reporting;
arrangements for monitoring data on POPs; rules of procedure and
financial rules; and the POPs Review Committee.
SAICM PREPCOM-3: SAICM PrepCom-3, held from 19-24 September 2005,
in Vienna, addressed the SAICM high-level declaration, overarching
policy strategy, and global plan of action. The work of the PrepCom will
culminate in an International Conference on Chemicals Management to be
held in Dubai from 4-6 February 2006, which is expected to adopt the
strategic approach. Elements upon which delegates did not reach
agreement include: principles and approaches, description of the SAICM
as �voluntary,� financial considerations, international illegal traffic,
governance, and the timing and frequency of International Conference on
Chemicals Management meetings.
WORKING GROUP ON NON-COMPLIANCE: A meeting of the open-ended ad
hoc working group on non-compliance was held back-to-back with PIC COP-2
in Rome on 26-27 September 2005. Delegates raised the following issues:
an open and transparent mechanism; a focus on compliance rather than
non-compliance; developing country constraints; trigger mechanisms;
facilitative vs. punitive measures; and the presence of observers in
non-compliance procedures. The results of this meeting will be
considered at COP-2.
|
This issue of the Earth
Negotiations Bulletin �
<enb@iisd.org>
is written and edited by
Soledad Aguilar, Paula
Barrios, Alice Bisiaux,
Noelle Eckley Selin, and
Peter Wood. The Digital
Editor is Dan Birchall. The
Editor is Pamela S. Chasek,
Ph.D. <pam@iisd.org>
and the Director of IISD
Reporting Services is
Langston James �Kimo� Goree
VI <kimo@iisd.org>.
The Sustaining Donors of the
Bulletin are the
Government of the United
States of America (through
the Department of State
Bureau of Oceans and
International Environmental
and Scientific Affairs), the
Government of Canada
(through CIDA), the Swiss
Agency for Environment,
Forests and Landscape (SAEFL),
the United Kingdom (through
the Department for
International Development -
DFID), the Danish Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, the
Government of Germany
(through the German Federal
Ministry of Environment -
BMU, and the German Federal
Ministry of Development
Cooperation - BMZ), the
Netherlands Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, the
European Commission (DG-ENV),
and the Italian Ministry of
Environment. General Support
for the Bulletin
during 2005 is provided by
the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP),
the Government of Australia,
the Austrian Federal
Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry, Environment and
Water Management, the
Ministry of Sustainable
Development and the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs of
Sweden, the Ministry of
Environment and the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs of
Norway, the Ministry of
Environment and the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs of
Finland, SWAN International,
the Japanese Ministry of
Environment (through the
Institute for Global
Environmental Strategies -
IGES) and the Japanese
Ministry of Economy, Trade
and Industry (through the
Global Industrial and Social
Progress Research Institute
- GISPRI). Funding for
translation of the Earth
Negotiations Bulletin
into French has been
provided by the
International Organization
of the Francophonie (IOF)
and the French Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. Funding for
the translation of the
Earth Negotiations Bulletin
into Spanish has been
provided by the Ministry of
Environment of Spain. The
opinions expressed in the
Earth Negotiations Bulletin
are those of the authors
and do not necessarily
reflect the views of IISD or
other donors. Excerpts from
the Earth Negotiations
Bulletin may be used in
non-commercial publications
with appropriate academic
citation. For information on
the Bulletin,
including requests to
provide reporting services,
contact the Director of IISD
Reporting Services at <kimo@iisd.org>,
+1-646-536-7556 or 212 East
47th St. #21F, New York, NY
10017, USA. The ENB Team at
COP-2 can be contacted by
e-mail at <soledad@iisd.org>. |
|