|
Published by
the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Vol. 11 No. 40
Wednesday, 21 February 2001
ISTANBUL+5 PREPCOM II HIGHLIGHTS
TUESDAY, 20 FEBRUARY 2001
The second session of the
preparatory committee for Istanbul+5 (PrepCom II) resumed for its
second of deliberations at the UNCHS in Nairobi. Delegates offered
comments, in morning and afternoon Plenary sessions, on the draft
declaration on cities and other human settlements in the new
millennium, and the Committee of the Whole (COW) met in the
afternoon to debate agenda items pertaining to the special session.
The Drafting Committee also met informally in the afternoon to
discuss procedure for moving forward on negotiating the outcome
document.
PLENARY
In the morning Plenary, a General
Assembly (GA) representative said the PrepCom’s objective is to
prepare the outcome document, the primary document to be adopted in
the special session. She cautioned against submitting too many
declarations outside of this document.
Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka, UNCHS
Executive Director, introduced the draft declaration on cities and
other human settlements in the new millennium (HS/C/PC.2/3) and the
supporting draft on further actions and initiatives to implement the
commitments of the Habitat Agenda (HS/C/PC.2/3/Add.1). She said the
document on further actions and initiatives could be negotiated
paragraph by paragraph or used to expand the sections of the
declaration on further initiatives, which could then be incorporated
into the draft report for consideration by the special session.
Chair Garcia-Durán opened the floor for comments.
FURTHER ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES: The
US said success in implementing the Habitat Agenda depends on access
to investment, and recommended that the special session recognize
the importance of family and respect national priorities and legal
frameworks. INDIA highlighted private-public cooperation for housing
initiatives, use of appropriate technology in housing for the urban
poor, and the increasing presence of women in local body governance.
THE PHILIPPINES urged consideration of an assessment of the impact
of the WTO and the Uruguay Round of the GATT on developing country
human settlements. ZIMBABWE noted the negative impacts of
globalization, structural adjustment programs (SAPs), and HIV/AIDS.
The REPUBLIC OF KOREA called for providing shelter to the homeless
and combating urban crime. BRAZIL highlighted the concentration of
poverty in metropolitan areas, unequal income distribution, lack of
social services and infrastructure, and problems with urban
transport. BURUNDI said high population growth and density has
caused land shortage in rural areas, necessitating the adoption of
an urbanization policy, as well as a reconstruction strategy to
address the 1993 civil war. EGYPT said the situations in the
Palestinian territories and in Iraq are impeding progress, and
called for UN resolutions to prevent further deterioration.
CANADA urged that both the report
and declaration should reflect the realities of both unitary and
federated states and the lack of a common understanding of
"subsidiarity." Regarding recommendations resulting from a
meeting organized with the International New Towns Association,
MOROCCO urged that future strategies reflect the need for:
mechanisms to enable local participation in managing cities;
international assistance and solidarity; and supportive government
policies for marginalized groups in arid regions.
MALAWI outlined constraints in
implementation, including lack of access to land, credit, basic
services, building materials, security of tenure and housing
standards, as well as macro-economic factors. The COALITION OF
AFRICAN ORGANISATIONS FOR FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
called for rapid international support to enable UNCHS to alleviate
the growing incidences of poverty and homelessness. The
INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION (ILO) supported reviewing linkages
between urban and rural employment and sustainable human development
settlements.
The UN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
(UNCHR) called attention to, inter alia: the need to accord
women substantive rights and a specific commitment to gender
equality; and the need for increased recognition of human rights by
the executive and parliament arms of government. The EU said the
Habitat Agenda and Agenda 21 should go hand-in-hand.
The HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
COALITION said poverty alleviation and access to housing are
intrinsically linked, and called for the development of national
definitions of "adequate housing" to be used as a
benchmark in assessing progress. THE WORLD BANK underscored
collaboration with local partners in launching the City Alliance, a
multi-partner coalition dedicated to reducing poverty through public
and private sector partnerships.
THE HUAIROU COMMISSION expressed
concern over replacing references to "gender equality"
with "gender mainstreaming" and attempting to renegotiate
the content of the principle on the various forms of the family.
DRAFT DECLARATION ON CITIES AND
OTHER HUMAN SETTLEMENTS: INDONESIA drew
distinctions between squatting settlements and slums, and noted
conflict between national and indigenous laws on land ownership.
BANGLADESH called for more specific language on international
cooperation and on the decisive role of micro-credit in reducing
poverty. CANADA supported one outcome document that: restates the
inclusion of all government levels and Habitat partners; emphasizes
environmental challenges and opportunities for cities; focuses on
poverty, women and children; and recognizes decentralized
cooperation for sharing experiences between municipalities.
The SUDAN expressed a reservation
on the references to "local autonomy" in self-government
in the proposed World Charter. CHINA supported including a paragraph
on the central government’s role and proposed deleting references
to the World Charter on Local Self-Government. The EU said the
declaration is still too technical, should be more policy-oriented
and should emphasize women’s equal rights to property ownership.
Noting that the Istanbul Declaration and Habitat Agenda refer to
human rights instruments, the UNCHR said human rights and a
rights-based agenda should be the declaration’s guiding
principles. MEXICO supported including the concepts of city and
region, as well as aspects relating to the metropolitan approach,
environmental improvement, and agreements for technical and
international cooperation.
The ILO proposed recognizing the
rapid rate of urbanization and urbanization of poverty. The CONGO
supported reflecting the need for peace. THAILAND said the
declaration ignores the importance of regional commissions’
assistance to member countries. The JMJ CHILDREN’S FUND said the
family is the basic unit of society and should be reflected in the
declaration. In conclusion, the Secretariat said delegates could
prepare two outcome documents: the first, a short political
declaration derived from the draft declaration; and the second, a
reworking of the draft document on further initiatives, which could
incorporate related text from the draft declaration.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The COW returned to its discussion
on the thematic committee (HS/C/PC.2/4/Add.3). CANADA, with the EU,
noted that many participants were absent, said that informal
discussions have not yielded a consensus, and called for the
suspension of the debate until a later session of the COW. INDIA
suggested themes of cost-effective local solutions and transparency
of local governance be considered by the thematic committee. Chair
Fall proposed, and delegates agreed to, the creation of a contact
group to discuss the thematic committee.
The COW turned its attention to
the provisional agenda for the special session (HS/C/PC.2/6) and
organizational arrangements for the special session, including rules
of procedure (HS/C/PC.2/7, Add.1 and Add.2). Regarding participation
of speakers other than Member States, the US proposed deleting a
paragraph stating that the last two speaking slots at each Plenary
meeting, except for the first and last Plenary meetings, might be
reserved for participants other than Member States, on the grounds
that this was inconsistent with the rules of procedure regarding
observers. The EU said the narrow slots reserved for Habitat Agenda
partners were recommended by the GA President, with a view to
include accredited partners into the Plenary debate, and would in no
way create a precedent for other special sessions. With NORWAY and
CANADA, he stressed that deleting this language would constitute a
step backwards. The US and CHINA said it would be premature to
decide on speaking slots given time availability. CANADA responded
that while governments should have primary importance, they must
also hear views from partners.
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO suggested
including language allowing for such speakers if time allowed.
JAMAICA noted that with only two slots for more than 300 partners,
it would be difficult to determine which NGOs and local authorities
should speak, and asked whether one representative could be chosen
on behalf of all partners. The Secretariat said that networks could
be formed to report partners’ views. MOROCCO suggested examining
this in conjunction with the item on accreditation.
ALGERIA stated that the
hyper-politicization of this issue placed the spirit of Istanbul+5
in danger and proposed creating a contact group to resolve it. The
EU proposed that this issue be addressed in the contact group
discussing the thematic committee. Chair Fall agreed, and requested
that the contact group address both issues and report to the next
session of the COW.
DRAFTING COMMITTEE
During an informal meeting of the
Drafting Committee, Chair Manfred Konukiewitz (Germany) noted that
the Secretariat was still sorting out procedural issues and waiting
for a response from UN headquarters in New York regarding
participation in the Drafting Committee of all Habitat partners, but
said he did not want to hold up the Committee’s substantial work.
A number of delegates expressed disappointment with the decision to
exclude NGOs from the Drafting Committee. One delegate said he would
not be bound by the results of any informal committee meeting, while
another reiterated that since the Drafting Committee was one of the
main PrepCom committees, it should be open to NGO observers.
Chair Konukiewitz noted the
Committee would discuss: the draft declaration; the document on
further actions and initiatives; and a resolution on the promotion
of family support policies. He recalled the commitment made at
PrepCom I to take up the family resolution immediately, but some
delegates preferred discussing the draft declaration first. One
proponent of the resolution offered to put it aside if a substantive
paragraph on the family could be incorporated into the draft
declaration. The Committee agreed to begin work on the draft
declaration first.
Regarding a way forward in
elaborating an outcome document or documents, some delegates opposed
negotiating the document on further initiatives, as it was submitted
late in the process, but agreed that some of the elements could be
incorporated into the draft declaration. One regional group called
for a more visionary, political declaration, and suggested a
separate document on further initiatives. Delegates did not agree on
whether to negotiate one or two documents, but agreed to use the
present draft declaration as a basis for negotiation and to
incorporate elements of the future initiatives document and other
amendments. The Committee agreed to begin negotiations paragraph by
paragraph at its next session, and to look at including proposed
language on the family.
IN THE BREEZEWAYS
Mass confusion erupted over
procedure as the Drafting Committee attempted to begin its work.
Before the meeting could get under way, conflict arose over UN rules
of procedure regarding the presence of NGO observers, and whether
the Committee was a formal body of the PrepCom. Some participants
accused the countries vehemently opposed to NGO participation of
trying to sabotage the process, and expressed the fear that attempts
to exclude NGOs would be setting a precedent for the special
session, which they saw as backtracking from Habitat II. However,
others felt that a smaller group would ensure that work is completed
more effectively and efficiently. Some delegates commented that in
attempting to exclude NGOs, a whole morning of work had already been
wasted. Additional exclusionary efforts also incited conflict in the
COW, as a few countries objected to allotting speaking slots for
Habitat partners during the Plenary of the special session,
resulting in similar accusations from those with an interest in full
participation.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE:
The COW will meet at 9:00 am in Conference Room 1, and will hear a
report by the contact group regarding negotiations on contentious
issues related to the thematic committee and participation of
speakers during the special session. If additional time is needed,
the contact group will resume its deliberations.
DRAFTING COMMITTEE:
The Drafting Committee will meet at 10:00 am to begin negotiations
on the draft declaration and will continue throughout the day. The
Committee is expected to look at a proposed paragraph on the family
for inclusion in the declaration.
|