On Thursday, 29 June, the Plenary met in the morning and afternoon
to hear high-level government representatives. Working Groups
I and II met in the morning and evening. Contact groups, informal
informals and bilateral discussions took place throughout the
afternoon on globalization, labor, trade, indicators, and sound
principles and good practices.
PLENARY
Delegates heard statements on the review and appraisal
of progress since the WSSD and on proposals for further initiatives
for the full implementation of the Copenhagen Declaration and POA.
Speakers included one Head of State, two Deputy Prime Ministers,
23 Ministers, one Vice Minister and 10 Chiefs of Delegation. Plenary
statements can be found on the Internet at: http:// www.unog.ch/ga2000/socialsummit/speeches/speeches.htm
.
WORKING GROUP I: PART III
COMMITMENT 1: ENABLING SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: Sonia Felicity
Elliott reported that the contact group on environment had agreed
to merge language in the chapeau of paragraph 6 with 6(a), using
WSSD language and original text. They also agreed to delete 6(b).
IRAN accepted ad ref. Delegates agreed to language negotiated
in an informal informal under Chair Macquieira: paragraph 2, on
governance; paragraph 5, on rights; 6 ter, on regional guidelines;
10(a), on addressing excessive volatility of short-term capital
flows, including consideration, inter alia, of a temporary debt
standstill; paragraph 13, on the international economic decision-making
process, including a reference to ensuring the transparency and
accountability of IFIs; paragraph 16, on encouraging corporate
social responsibility by promoting awareness (16(a)) and providing
a just and stable framework (16(b)); and paragraph 19, on enhancing
international cooperation, including burden-sharing, inter alia,
to countries affected by natural disasters. Delegates agreed to
language in 8(c), on access for products of developing countries,
except for references to services and EIT countries. A reference
to the Global Compact in 16(c), on enhancing partnerships, also
remains bracketed.
COMMITMENT 7: AFRICA AND THE LDCs: Delegates noted 87(a)
and 95 should be negotiated as a package. In paragraph 95, JAPAN
could not accept reference to "countries that have not already
done so" in language on bilateral debt cancellation, and proposed
"welcome the/stress the importance of the implementation of bilateral
debt relief." BANGLADESH suggested, and the G-77/CHINA supported,
"implementing bilateral debt relief arrangements by creditor countries."
In a later session, delegates accepted language in 87(a) on implementing
appropriate debt relief initiatives that can lead to a sustainable
solution to debt burdens. The new formulation dropped a prior
reference to the HIPC initiative. In paragraph 95, on bilateral
debt relief, JAPAN agreed, ad ref, that it could accept language
on encouraging creditor countries to implement these arrangements.
After BANGLADESH expressed concerns about conditionality, delegates
agreed on language stressing that debt relief should contribute
to national development objectives including poverty eradication.
In paragraph 94, the EU agreed to drop its proposed reference
to poverty reduction. In paragraph 97, the G-77/CHINA suggested
new language welcoming the report of the Secretary-General, but
deleting EU language emphasizing links among, inter alia, democracy
and human rights. No consensus was reached.
COMMITMENT 8: STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMMES: In paragraph
104, the EU said they could accept reference to "would" if "by
governments" was deleted. JAPAN, the US and the G- 77/CHINA preferred
to keep "would" without deleting the reference to governments.
The EU conceded, and the paragraph was agreed. In 104 bis, Chair
Maquieira proposed, with support from SWITZERLAND, combining his
version of the original text with a US proposal on supporting
the evolving concept of poverty reduction strategy papers. The
G-77/ CHINA, with ALGERIA, suggested "noting" over "supporting."
The EU, NORWAY and CANADA preferred supporting. JAPAN proposed
"welcoming." MEXICO proposed, and all accepted, "taking into account."
The text was agreed. Debate on paragraph 105(c) focused on whether
transparency and accountability is required for both governments
and IFIs and whether to make the sub-paragraph into a separate
paragraph. The EU said the statement suggests IFIs would govern
countries, but also wanted the text linked to national policy
frameworks. The G-77/CHINA suggested "ensuring transparency and
accountability by both governments and IFIs for improved efficacy
of SAPs and social development goals," but JAPAN said the link
with social development goals is unclear. The paragraph remains
bracketed.
WORKING GROUP II: PART III
COMMITMENT 3: EMPLOYMENT: Following informal discussions,
JAPAN introduced a package proposal comprising: 38(a), on making
determined efforts to ratify ILO conventions concerning basic
workers' rights; 40 alt, on encouraging the private sector to
respect (and promote) basic worker rights as reaffirmed in the
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, with
"and promote" to be deleted if the package is agreed; and 47(a),
on making determined efforts to ratify ILO conventions concerning
equal remuneration for men and women workers. The package is pending.
In paragraph 45, on addressing employment issues of specific groups,
the G-77/CHINA, with others, advocated "migrant workers." The
EU, with CANADA, CYPRUS and JAPAN, opposed, and called for a reference
to "documented." Advocating deletion of the paragraph's reference
to migrants, the US specified documented workers who have acquired
the right to long-term residence. No agreement was reached. COMMITMENT
4: SOCIAL INTEGRATION: Removing reference to consular assistance,
delegates agreed on paragraph 63, on migrant protection. CANADA
reformulated paragraph 66, on addressing armed conflict causes,
as new 66 bis. CUBA opposed reference to good governance, specified
"root" causes, called for elaboration of causes and added Beijing+5
text on, inter alia, human rights, territorial integrity, political
independence and non-intervention. The HOLY SEE called for reference
to reduction of trade in arms and EGPYT to termination of foreign
occupation. No agreement was reached. In paragraph 69, on measures
to end foreign occupation, the US and EU restated their preference
to delete the paragraph. It remains bracketed.
COMMITMENT 6: EDUCATION AND HEALTH:An informal group
presented consensus text for paragraph 80, which: recognizes everyone's
right to the highest attainable health standards as contained
in relevant human rights agreements and the WHO Constitution;
recognizes the critical importance of access to essential medicines
at affordable prices; acknowledges the contribution of international
property rights to research, development and drug distribution,
and to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological
knowledge; and the free exercise, within national laws and international
agreements acceded to, to access life-saving, essential medicines.
COMMITMENT 10: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION: In paragraph
116, on social indicators, the EU proposed new text from an ECOSOC
resolution. Delegates questioned, inter alia, the reference to
a "limited number" of indicators, asking what these indicators
are. The text remains bracketed. Text proposed by an informal
group for 118 (c) refers to "supporting continuing existing cooperation
between the ECOSOC and the BWIs, in particular joint meetings
with the World Bank and the IMF, so that the objectives and the
policy approaches of UN conferences and summits are given due
consideration by those institutions." In Norway's formulation
of paragraph 123, on reforms to create a strengthened international
financial system, MEXICO specified strengthened "and more stable,"
and proposed adding "with a view to enabling it to deal more effectively
and in a timely manner with the new challenges of development."
The proposal is pending. In paragraph 124, on people-centered
sustainable development, all delegates except CUBA accepted the
text, which remains bracketed.
CONTACT GROUPS
GLOBALIZATION AND LABOR: Two groups of countries suggested
new formulations of paragraph 39, on labor standards. Both texts
proposed: recognizing the importance of the ILO's work; the desirability
for a dialogue between the ILO and certain international organizations;
stressing that labor standards should not be used for the purposes
of trade protection; and the importance of assessing gender-specific
impacts. The two texts differed, inter alia, on: whether the ILO
should "foster" or "continue to foster" dialogue; a reference
to social development; assessing the links between labor standards
and trade; the inclusion of civil society; a reference to countries'
competitive advantage; and the avoidance of overlapping responsibilities
between the various institutions. A number of countries emphasized
their fundamental opposition to the concept of this paragraph,
advocating its deletion. No consensus was reached. In 39 ter,
on achieving full employment and rights at work, a delegate proposed
text calling on the ILO, UN agencies and BWIs to work with governments
to develop approaches and strategies, and prepare reports for
these international organizations. Delegates had concerns on,
inter alia: sovereignty issues; the expertise of the UN and BWIs
on labor; and making formal requests of the ILO, an independent
body. Another delegate proposed a reformulation without reference
to the ILO and calling on BWIs to become more democratic and responsive
to LDC needs. No consensus was reached.
INFORMAL INFORMALS Delegates in one group debated paragraph
7, on an open-ended inter-governmental working group. They discussed
two issues: reference to best practices, which was retained with
the understanding that best practices could be drawn from any
country; and reference to integration of social policies in international
organizations, which appeared to place IFIs on equal footing with
governments and to elevate the legitimacy of their conditionalities
to the international level. The emerging consensus, which is contingent
upon the decision of references to IFIs, is to request ECOSOC,
through the Commission on Social Development, to find ways to
enable information sharing on best practices and to assist devel-oping
country member states to develop policies to promote the goals
of the Summit. In a second group on labor issues, delegates expressed
concern over the implied need to ratify ILO agreements in paragraph
38. On workers' rights in paragraph 40, some delegates opposed
reference to "promote" basic workers' rights in the private sector.
In a third group, delegates discussed paragraph 80, on TRIPS,
and developed language that would enable countries to utilize
the options within TRIPS to access needed medication without restrictions
or flouting TRIPS agreements. Issues included: attempts to de-link
human rights from intellectual property rights through the use
of commas and other punctuation; protection of patent rights in
the distribution process; and upholding international patent rights
alongside national laws. The success in developing consensus text
was due to the inability of some delegations to justify contradictions
with previously endorsed human rights provisions. In a fourth
group, delegates discussed paragraph 116, on the development of
qualitative and quantitative indicators, but reached no consensus.
The main concerns related to capacity, resource implications,
the top-down approach, standardization and context specificity.
Some delegates expressed a need for accountability measures. There
was discussion on the possibility of using existing measures,
such as the UNDP's Human Development Indices and World Bank designed
indicators. In paragraph 118, consensus has begun to emerge to
retain language on supporting existing cooperation and collaboration
with the BWIs, and dropping mention of UNCTAD, as it is a UN body,
and the ACC, because it is a technical body.
IN THE CORRIDORS With a merry
band of negotiators crammed into the Chair's office upstairs,
reportedly slaying the last difficult brackets, delegates claim
they could be wrapping up tonight around the hour for coffee,
cognac or 1957 Dom Perignon. That should give time for small group
musings, perhaps on who plans to reappear-or not, in one noticeable
case-at WSSD+10. Over the past five days, delegates from across
the spectrum have observed that a collegial spirit has mostly
stretched to match a time of deep political divisions. Developing
countries have struggled with issues of conditionality, and at
least one large nation that should be exercising its leadership
role is struggling with disinterest. But there is progress in
the form of new references to a temporary debt standstill, transparency
and accountability of IFIs, and the debate over the international
currency transaction tax, which an EU country now privately concedes
is an inevitability. And when the political declaration is finally
cleared, there can be package dancing all the way home...