Vol. 09 No. 151
Tuesday, 16 May 2000
On the first day of CBD COP-5, delegates heard opening
remarks, elected officers, adopted the agenda and addressed
pending issues. Reports were delivered on behalf of regional
preparatory workshops, international institutions, SBSTTA-4
and 5, the Working Group on Article 8(j), the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety and the Intersessional Meeting on the
Operations of the Convention (ISOC).
PLENARY
OPENING REMARKS: President of COP-4, László Miklós
(Slovakia), welcomed delegates and overviewed the CBD’s
achievements during the intersessional period, particularly
the Cartagena Protocol, SBSTTA’s progress, the ISOC, the
Panel of Experts on Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Working
Group on Article 8(j).
Hamdallah Zedan, Executive Secretary of the CBD, noted that
the intersessional meetings and activities on biosafety,
benefit-sharing, traditional knowledge, dryland and
agricultural biodiversity, and review of the financial
resources and mechanism have laid a solid foundation for the
CBD’s future development. He also noted the forthcoming
ten-year review for the implementation of Agenda 21 and
associated conventions.
Klaus Töpfer, UNEP Executive Director, noted challenges
facing Africa, including conflicts and poverty, and encouraged
investment in sustainable development rather than in managing
conflicts once they arise. He urged awareness of the
relationship between poverty and biodiversity. He lauded the
finalization of the Cartagena Protocol and noted the signing
ceremony to be held on 24 May.
Daniel arap Moi, President of Kenya, welcomed COP-5
delegates to Nairobi and noted that biodiversity is a vital
resource for socioeconomic development and for the long-term
well-being of communities. He stressed that the COP should
focus on the development of a work programme for the
implementation of the Cartagena Protocol, access to genetic
resources and benefit-sharing (ABS), biodiversity in dryland
ecosystems and sustainable use. President Moi signed the
Cartagena Protocol, making Kenya its first signatory.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS: COP-4 President Miklós nominated
Francis Nyenze, Minister of Environment and Natural Resources
of Kenya, as the President of COP-5, who was then elected by
acclamation. Regional groups announced their representatives
to the COP-5 Bureau: Phocus Ntayombya (Rwanda) for the African
Group; A.H. Zakhri (Malaysia) and Manal Al-Dulaimi (Kuwait)
for the Asian Group; Mariangela Rebuá (Brazil) and Elaine
Fisher (Jamaica) for the Group of Latin American and Caribbean
Countries (GRULAC); Gordana Beltram (Slovenia) and Ilona
Jepsen (Latvia) for the Central and Eastern European Countries
(CEE); and Marina von Weissenberg (Finland) and Peter Schei
(Norway) for the Western Europe and Others Group (WEOG). Peter
Schei was elected as Chair of Working Group I and Elaine
Fisher as Chair of Working Group II.
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: COP-5 President Nyenze introduced
the provisional agenda (UNEP/CBD/COP/5/1). BRAZIL, supported
by COLOMBIA, proposed including discussion on global plant
conservation under the agenda item on cross-cutting issues.
The NETHERLANDS proposed, and it was agreed, that this be
discussed with the sub-item on alien species. ARGENTINA called
for discussion of the Cartagena Protocol in a working group.
It was noted that the Protocol would be discussed in Plenary.
PENDING ISSUES: President Nyenze noted that no agreement
had been reached and suggested that informal consultations
continue. Further discussion was postponed to the next COP.
REGIONAL MEETING REPORTS: Zedan recalled that COP-4 had
requested regional meetings be held on the implementation of
the Convention, but regretted that this was not possible due
to budgetary constraints. He noted that regional preparatory
meetings were convened in the Pacific Islands, Africa and
Europe. The COOK ISLANDS, on behalf of the Pacific Island
Parties, overviewed the Pacific Island workshop, which
developed recommendations on ABS, indigenous knowledge and
regional capacity developing needs. She asked the COP to
recognize the need for continuing assistance for such
meetings.
ALGERIA, on behalf of the African Group, underscored
Africa's commitment to biodiversity conservation despite its
lack of means for implementation, and stressed the importance
of implementing Article 8(j) in accordance with local
community needs.
ZIMBABWE presented a report of the fifth Global
Biodiversity Forum for Southern Africa, held in Harare.
Meeting participants shared national experiences with CBD
implementation; developed recommendations on the work
programme on dry and sub-humid lands, sustainable use and
issues related to ABS and traditional knowledge; and made
recommendations for future activities.
On behalf of the European region, LATVIA noted that the
intergovernmental conference "Biodiversity in
Europe," held in Riga, addressed: agricultural
biodiversity; sustainable use, including tourism; biodiversity
indicators, monitoring and reporting; scientific and technical
cooperation and the CHM; financial resources and mechanism;
and CBD implementation and regional cooperation.
BRAZIL, on behalf of GRULAC, and IRAN, on behalf of the
Asian Group, regretted that regional consultations before
COP-5 could not be held due to lack of funds. NIGERIA, on
behalf of the G-77/China, called for new and additional
financial resources, and stressed that issues such as
financial resources, technology transfer and capacity-building
be fully dealt with at COP-5.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS’ STATEMENTS: The FOOD AND
AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION underlined the role of biodiversity
in fighting hunger and malnutrition, reported on ongoing
cooperation with the CBD and expressed interest in
collaboration, particularly on forest biodiversity and alien
species. The RAMSAR CONVENTION highlighted progress achieved
in developing synergies with the CBD and underscored the need
to translate this collaboration into action in the field. He
expressed hope that COP-5 would endorse the proposed joint
work plan for 2000-2001. The WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
ORGANIZATION highlighted its activities in four areas related
to intellectual property and biodiversity: ABS; protection of
traditional knowledge; access to and transfer of technology
relevant to sustainable use of biodiversity; and scientific
and technical cooperation in the sustainable use of
biodiversity. UNESCO highlighted its continued assistance to
the CBD, including: elaboration of principles and operational
guidance for the ecosystem approach; provision of information
related to thematic programmes; and design of a global
initiative on biodiversity education and public awareness.
Regarding the Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI), he called for
accelerating the process and funding for taxonomic efforts and
new North-South and South-South linkages. The CONVENTION ON
MIGRATORY SPECIES (CMS) addressed its complementarities with
the CBD. He noted the GEF's approval of two medium-sized
projects among the CBD, RAMSAR and CMS, and drew attention to
a study on the complementarities between the CBD and CMS (UNEP/CBD/COP/5/Inf/28).
The fifteenth GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FORUM summarized its key
conclusions, including that the COP should: recommend full
integration of monetary and non-monetary goods and services of
biodiversity into poverty alleviation strategies; ensure
national biodiversity strategies and action plans take full
account of the needs of the poor; ensure full and effective
participation of indigenous peoples in the CBD’s work on
ABS; ensure that resource country measures are complemented by
those of user countries; and adopt strong work programmes on
agrobiodiversity and drylands. The INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS
FORUM recommended: the continuation of the Ad Hoc Working
Group on Article 8(j); the full participation of indigenous
peoples in all processes of the CBD, including COP-5;
coordination of the CBD’s work on traditional knowledge with
other international organizations; recognition of the
fundamental role of women; support for an indigenous peoples’
CHM; and support for a moratorium on all bioprospecting
activities in indigenous peoples’ territories until
appropriate legislation is in place.
REPORTS OF SBSTTA: SBSTTA-4 Chair A.H. Zakhri (Malaysia)
introduced the meeting’s report and recommendations (UNEP/CBD/COP/5/2).
He stated that SBSTTA-4 addressed: SBSTTA’s programme of
work; terms of reference for expert groups; the GTI; status
and trends of terrestrial biodiversity; alien species;
technologies for plant gene expression; environmental impact
assessments; and sustainable use, including tourism. He also
noted SBSTTA’s improved effectiveness in bridging the gap
between researchers and policy-makers.
SBSTTA-5 Chair Cristián Samper (Colombia) noted SBSTTA-5’s
report and recommendations (UNEP/CBD/COP/5/3). He drew
attention to the meeting’s priority issues: the programme of
work for dryland biodiversity; agricultural biodiversity; the
ecosystem approach; biodiversity indicators; sustainable use;
guidelines for the second national reports; and ad hoc
technical expert groups. He also proposed strengthening SBSTTA’s
work, through: streamlining its agenda; intersessional
mechanisms for scientific assessments; better use of the CHM;
and strengthened relationships with other conventions and
international scientific processes.
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON ARTICLE 8(J): SPAIN
introduced the Report of the Working Group on the
Implementation of Article 8(j) and Related Provisions (UNEP/
CBD/COP/5/5), and reported that the meeting made
recommendations on ways and means to protect traditional
knowledge, the Group’s work programme and measures to
strengthen cooperation among local communities at the
international level.
REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL: Ambassador
Philémon Yang (Cameroon), Chair of the Bureau of the
open-ended ad hoc Intergovernmental Committee for the
Cartagena Protocol (ICCP), introduced the ICCP's work plan
prepared by the Bureau, and invited the COP to endorse it. He
said the proposed work plan addresses issues to be considered
at the first meeting of the Parties to the Protocol (MOP-1),
and activities central to its operation. ARGENTINA asked for
further consideration of the work plan and called for
prioritization of capacity-building and development of the
biosafety CHM over identification and implementation. COLOMBIA
said identification and implementation are equally important.
TURKEY stated that decision-making procedures under Articles 5
(Pharmaceuticals) and 6 (Transit and Contained Use) of the
Protocol should not be addressed at ICCP-1. PORTUGAL, on
behalf of the EU, welcomed the draft work plan for the ICCP.
The EUROPEAN COMMISSION suggested that clarification of the
ICCP mandate could be more useful than negotiation of the work
plan.
AUSTRALIA highlighted the importance of capacity-building
and proposed forming a group to finalize a better focused work
plan. IRAN expressed concern over the emphasis on the private
sector for providing capacity-building. MALAWI emphasized the
need for capacity-building with regard to biotechnology.
INDONESIA underscored private sector contributions to
strengthening capacity.
CANADA stressed that a CHM must be established prior to
MOP-1 of the Protocol. SWITZERLAND identified as priorities
the CHM's establishment, development of a coordinated
programme to assist in capacity-building and preparations for
MOP-1. FRANCE noted that the first ICCP meeting will take
place from 11-15 December 2000 in Montpelier.
REPORT OF THE ISOC: COP-4 President Mikl�s introduced the
ISOC's report (UNEP/CBD/COP/5/4), which concentrates on two
main tasks: preparation for and conduct of COP meetings; and
further work on ABS with a focus on the Expert Panel�s.
IN THE BREEZEWAYS
As delegates geared up for substantive discussions at
COP-5, the breezeways buzzed over what the key areas of debate
might be. Along with talk of how access to genetic resources
and its sub-items would be addressed, discussion also arose
over the Cartagena Protocol and which Parties would and would
not sign during the meeting. The debate engendered over the
ICCP�s work plan had some delegates wondering whether the
implementation of the Protocol would prove as difficult as its
negotiation.