Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development
(IISD)
Vol. 05 No. 90
Tuesday, February 24 1998
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE CSD INTERSESSIONAL WORKING GROUP MONDAY, 23 FEBRUARY 1998
Delegates to the Commission on Sustainable Developments Ad Hoc
Intersessional Working Group (ISWG) on Strategic Approaches to
Freshwater Management gathered in the Trusteeship Council room
for the first day of their week-long meeting. They elected the
Co-Chairs, adopted the agenda and began to exchange views on the
subject of freshwater management and CSD responses.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
Delegates elected Rogatien Biaou (Benin) and JoAnne DiSano
(Australia) as Co-Chairs for the Working Group. They also
adopted the agenda and other organizational matters
(E/CN.17/ISWG.I/1998/1) and invited the Convention on Wetlands
of International Importance (Ramsar Convention) to attend as an
intergovernmental organization (E/CN.17/ISWG.I/1998/L.1).
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTATION
The Secretariat introduced relevant documentation prepared by
the Secretary-General (E/CN.17/1998/2 and 3) and the report of
the Expert Group Meeting on Strategic Approaches to Freshwater
Management (E/CN.17/1998/11 and 2/Add.1). He also called
attention to the Report of the High-level Advisory Board on
Sustainable Development regarding energy, transport and water
(E/CN.17/1997/17/Add.1).
He highlighted the contents of the Secretary-Generals report on
strategic approaches to freshwater management (E/CN.17/1998/2),
which identifies six major problem areas, discusses implications
for policy and management, and presents proposals for strategic
actions. It stresses the need for integrated management,
sufficient information for decision making, and the need for
decisions to be taken at a high-level and supported by all
levels. Document E/CN.17/1998/3 reports on related activities of
the UN system and, among others, notes the need for future
system-wide efforts on information gathering, dissemination and
analysis and to monitor problems world-wide.
OPENING REMARKS
Co-Chair Rogatien Biaou (Benin) said delegates are in an
excellent position to recognize the importance of freshwater,
particularly in developing countries and especially in Africa.
He said the UN has a comparative advantage in ensuring better
overall management of freshwater and outlined priorities to be
addressed.
Co-Chair JoAnne DiSano (Australia) recounted recent
intergovernmental processes that addressed the basic principles
of freshwater management. She said the present task is to
identify processes for taking forward these principles, identify
problems in implementation and analyze difficulties.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
INDONESIA, on behalf of the G-77/CHINA, said the CSD should take
stock of progress in implementing existing plans of action and
identify constraints, such as finance and technology. He stated
that water resources development and management should be
planned in an integrated manner, taking into account short- and
long-term needs, and should incorporate the need to increase
international cooperation and to renew commitments made in
Agenda 21. He expressed concern about elevating the economic
function of water over other important functions, including food
security and poverty alleviation. He stated that the concept of
adopting pricing policies geared toward cost recovery may be
premature and requires further study. He emphasized that
governments should continue to play a major role in freshwater
management in the future and called on the international
community to intensify efforts in providing technical and
financial cooperation to developing countries for freshwater
management.
The UK, on behalf of the EU, said the ISWG should build
consensus on a strategic approach to the sustainable use of
freshwater. Such an approach should include: a common
appreciation of the importance of water and desired goals, such
as the provision of safe drinking water and sanitation,
promotion of food security, elimination of poverty, and
reduction of water-related disease; agreement on key elements of
necessary local, national and international action programmes;
recognition that the main efforts for developing sustainable
uses of water must occur at the local and national levels;
international collaboration and support for capacity building,
exchange of information and know-how and mobilization of
financial resources; and follow-up to CSD recommendations.
COLOMBIA called for a recognition and fundamental understanding
of the social dimensions of freshwater issues, warned against
the error of adopting an economic or merely environmental
approach, and called for an integrated approach. Expressing
concern about a Secretariat proposal to use market approaches to
reflect water use, he noted that in certain circumstances the
indiscriminate nature of market mechanisms could create tension
and conflict by failing to reflect needs. He also called for:
recognition of state sovereignty over management of freshwater
resources; effective mechanisms for cooperation with developing
countries; a special fund to promote the efforts of developing
countries; and for local group participation in defining and
solving problems related to freshwater management.
SAMOA, for the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), noted
that freshwater issues are critical for all small island states.
He highlighted issues of poor design, lack of maintenance,
technical incapacity and a lack of community ownership of
facilities. He underlined the impact of climate change and noted
that island communities had already experienced water shortage
and saline intrusion. He noted fears about the consequences of
future sea level rises and that this problem would not be
adequately addressed by the CSD or the UNFCCC process.
JAPAN recalled his Prime Ministers statement to UNGASS
regarding Japans plans to promote the creation of water and
sewage systems. He called for analysis of conditions in each
country and region, sharing of hydrological information, and
emphasis on such areas as cooperation among riparian countries,
transfer of technology and know-how and close cooperation with
international organizations that have experience in water aid.
CANADA stressed partnerships, using best practices based on
ecosystems, and integrating scientific and social knowledge into
projects. He said key areas for an integrated approach include
institutional and legal capacity building, improved
international cooperation, and enhancing the role of women. He
called on the CSD to address gaps and barriers and use
innovative means. INDIA noted that considerable work has been
done at all levels and suggested that delegates identify
constraints to implementing existing plans. He highlighted the
UNGASS decision that considered water a social and economic
good. Regarding the EUs proposed objectives, he said it is
difficult to lay down one single solution because solutions need
to be found for each country.
MEXICO noted that the Secretary-Generals report does not appear
to differ from a report submitted four years ago and gives the
impression that questions of freshwater management are being
raised for the first time. He expressed concern about some
simplistic assertions regarding the involvement of the private
sector. He recommended: systematization of information provided
by governments to the Secretariat to ensure direct and
consistent freshwater management; follow-through on progress
already made, including the need to take advantage of existing
infrastructure such as the Committee on Natural Resources;
strengthening of the concept of integrated management to include
long-term planning; strengthened water centers and a network of
users and operators; information centers to clearly determine,
qualitatively and quantitatively, available water resources;
access for marginalized social groups; increased institutional
capacity for operators and users; diversification of financing
and public investment; strengthening of the management role of
women; and transfer of environmentally sound technologies
(ESTs). FINLAND called on CSD-6 to contribute substantially to
the implementation of existing recommendations. He said the
Secretary-Generals report does not adequately reflect the need
for an integrated strategy and institutional development. He
said water is both an economic and a social good.
AUSTRALIA noted that the document's use of "must" raises
problems, noting that no country would willingly cede control
over its water sources. He questioned the need for a new
freshwater fund. He described ongoing initiatives and called for
better efforts to draw on those experiences. He supported the
use of economic instruments and encouraged an examination of
public-private partnerships. SYRIA said assigning an economic
value to water would increase the number of individuals lacking
access to water. He said this approach would contravene
principles of international law.
The US underscored that the CSD must not rewrite Agenda 21 but
find ways to implement it. He supported the use of an integrated
approach to freshwater management and called on all governments
to redouble efforts to address water issues. He emphasized the
need to: forge partnerships across sectors and between the
public and private sectors to mobilize resources to meet water
needs; better coordinate existing efforts and strengthen
institutions addressing freshwater; redouble efforts in
sanitation; foster greater public participation in decision
making, emphasizing the key role of women; and recognize all the
values of water -- economic, social and environmental. He called
on the ISWG and the CSD to formulate key recommendations for
freshwater management. DENMARK highlighted the need for balance
in addressing water issues. He stressed that the need for
quantity should not overshadow the need for quality of water;
the need for all stakeholders to participate in and benefit from
water management must be balanced with the need to implement a
catchment area approach; and pricing policies and cost recovery
must be balanced with issues of equity.
The FAO stressed the important role that irrigation plays and
noted that it can be sustainable, given the right technology and
sufficient financial resources. He proposed investing in water-
saving technology and improved project management, among others.
The RAMSAR CONVENTION said the only issue is to define the
concepts of integrated water resource management. The dialogue
has gone on long enough, and those with expertise should be
connected to those in the donor community that can mobilize for
action. EGYPT highlighted the need for increased technical
efficiency by agriculture and industry, noting that these
sectors could cut their use of water without sacrifice. He said
water pricing and cost recovery were difficult concepts to
accept because every country has its own technical and political
considerations. The cost recovery approach could be introduced
once countries reach a certain level of development.
IN THE CORRIDORS
Ideas on strategic approaches to freshwater seemed to dry up
during the morning and afternoon sessions of the first day of
the CSD Intersessional. Some delegates put the early
adjournments down to the fact that virtually everything has been
said about strategy and the time has come for action and
implementation. Mindful of this leveraging opportunity, some
developing countries have seized the moment to float proposals
for new resources. A developed country participant signaled the
likely response to that idea when he confided that the demand is
likely to end up in a very deep hole.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
INTERSESSIONAL WORKING GROUP: The Group is expected to continue
with general statements during the morning. It will consider
issues related to technology transfer during the afternoon. Both
meetings will be held in the Trusteeship Council room.
BRIEFING ON THE CBD: Calestous Juma, Executive Secretary of the
Convention on Biological Diversity, will hold a briefing from
2:00 - 3:00 pm in Conference Room 5 to discuss the upcoming
Fourth Conference of the Parties, biodiversity of inland
waterways, intersessional activities and the results of recent
meetings.
|