|
Published
by the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Vol. 05 No. 182
Friday, 27 April 2001
CSD-9 HIGHLIGHTS:
THURSDAY, 26 APRIL 2001
A day before its scheduled
conclusion, the CSD conducted its work primarily in informal
consultations. Brief morning sessions of the Drafting Groups
discussing transport and international cooperation for an
enabling environment were followed by an
"informal-informal" consultation on nuclear energy
technologies in the afternoon. The Drafting Group on
atmosphere met in the late afternoon, and the Group on
transport reconvened in an evening session.
DRAFTING GROUP I
An evening session scheduled
for 10:30 pm failed to take place after some delegations
indicated informally that they were not prepared to negotiate
due to a misunderstanding regarding what had been agreed to in
some of the informal consultations held earlier in the day.
DRAFTING GROUP II
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
FOR AN ENABLING ENVIRONMENT: This
Group, chaired by Alison Drayton (Guyana), considered the
section on recommendations at the national level in the draft
decision on international cooperation for an enabling
environment. Delegates agreed to replace text regarding the
provision of an enabling environment through, inter alia,
"the rule of law" and capacity building, with
delegates accepting MEXICO’s language calling for
"appropriate macro-economic social and environmental
policies." The US indicated its willingness to drop
references to the rule of law if the Group were to accept a
subparagraph recommending the establishment and implementation
of legal, regulatory and enforcement frameworks. He also added
references to "intellectual property" and
"environmental protection." The G-77/CHINA responded
by proposing new language for a subparagraph on international
cooperation for international, regional and national
sustainable development policies to support poverty
eradication and for another subparagraph to suggest that
collaboration between the WTO and other relevant international
institutions be conducted "in accordance with their
respective mandates."
The chapeau on national
action "that takes into account national
circumstances," remains bracketed, following statements
by the US and SWITZERLAND urging that the language be
consistent with the chapeau on international action. A
proposal stating that sustainable development
"programmes" or "strategies" are
formulated and implemented through national consultative
processes also remains bracketed. On governance, the
G-77/CHINA preferred language from the Millennium Declaration,
while Chair Drayton proposed CSD-8 compromise language. The
proposal remains bracketed. Agreement on this issue will
determine references to the "improvement of transparency
of government." Text requiring the development of
policies that integrate the objectives of the three pillars of
sustainable development into sectoral policies is also
bracketed, pending acceptance elsewhere in the decision that
economic "growth" is one of the pillars.
DRAFTING GROUP III
This Group, chaired by David
Stuart (Australia), met in the morning and evening to continue
discussing the revised text of a draft decision on transport
and in the late afternoon to resume deliberations on
atmosphere.
TRANSPORT:
On international cooperation, the US supported language on
ensuring sustainable development through transport, with the
G-77/CHINA suggesting a reference to "sufficient
financing." The G-77/CHINA said the CSD lacks the mandate
to encourage international financial institutions to
prioritize transport projects. Delegates disagreed on actions
and the transfer of technologies to "phase out" the
use of lead in gasoline. Differences also remained on
International Civil Aviation Organization actions on climate
change.
On regional cooperation, the
G-77/CHINA insisted on reference to the exchange of
"successful practices and experiences" rather than
"best practices." The EU, supported by AUSTRALIA,
requested maintaining text on transboundary pollution
agreements, while the G-77/CHINA opposed, referring to the
implications on health and environment. The G-77/CHINA, with
CANADA, emphasized a coordinated approach to infrastructure
and land use planning.
On recommendations at the
national level, the G-77/CHINA opposed EU proposals on the
polluter pays principle by eliminating environmentally-harmful
subsidies and on the promotion of sustainability in the
transport sector. The G-77/CHINA proposed merging text on
promoting fuel efficiency with the language on involvement of
the private sector, with CANADA adding reference to cleaner
vehicles. The promotion of access to efficient, safe,
affordable and environmentally-sound public transport systems
was supported by the EU and AUSTRALIA, although the G-77/CHINA
opposed specific references to urban and interurban railway
and domestic marine transport services. The US and AUSTRALIA
suggested including references to non-motorized transport.
In the evening session,
delegates agreed to G-77/CHINA-proposed text in the section on
general considerations, which states that decisions concerning
transport issues should reflect the fact that economic growth,
social development and environmental protection are
interdependent and mutually reinforcing components of
sustainable development. Delegates accepted text stating that
dialogue with major groups is encouraged, and agreed to delete
references to "sustainable" transport in text
referring to transport impacts to women’s health, and to
accessibility and availability to women in facilitating social
and economic progress.
ATMOSPHERE: Chair
Stuart distributed a revised text that had been amended taking
into account the previous day’s discussions. He informed
delegates that informal negotiations had been held on text
relating to: general considerations; international
cooperation, including the chapeau and references to private
sector involvement in technology transfer and to atmospheric
emissions and air pollutants; and international legal
instruments. He said amended text based on these informal
negotiations would be reported back to the Group on Friday, 27
April.
Chair Stuart then asked
delegates to address other bracketed text. AUSTRALIA
introduced compromise text on monitoring of the earth’s
atmosphere in the section on international cooperation. He
said the text relates to: strengthening systematic observation
by improving ground-based monitoring stations and increasing
use of satellites; continuing the measurement programme for
total column ozone supports; supporting programmes such as the
Global Climate Observing System; and encouraging the joint
planning and implementation of a strategy for integrated
global observations. JAPAN said it accepted the text, while
the G-77/CHINA gave a favorable initial response, pending
further internal consultations.
On regional cooperation, the
EU and the US said they could be flexible regarding wording on
enhancing complementarity and coherence in measures to
mitigate local, regional and global problems related to the
atmosphere, while the G-77/CHINA questioned whether the
reference was appropriate. On recommendations at the national
level, the EU responded to other delegates’ concerns about a
reference to "short term plans in urban areas" by
proposing alternative wording supporting "priority
attention to human settlements programmes and policies to
reduce urban air pollution." The G-77/CHINA suggested
that the references to human settlements and shelter were
shifting the primary focus away from atmosphere. He also
proposed deleting text in this section on ozone-depleting
substances.
INFORMAL-INFORMAL
CONSULTATIONS ON NUCLEAR ENERGY
An informal-informal
consultation, facilitated by Gustavo Ainchil (Argentina), met
to discuss text on nuclear energy contained in the draft
decisions on energy and transport.
On the challenges associated
with nuclear energy, the G-77/ CHINA, JAPAN, NEW ZEALAND and
others, proposed using the Chair’s original text, while
POLAND and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA supported the EU’s text.
SAUDI ARABIA preferred deleting the entire section. Using the
original text, delegates agreed to bracket reference to, inter
alia: nuclear proliferation; "transboundary
consequences" of nuclear energy; and the G-77/CHINA’s
proposal on promoting international cooperation in the
peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as their suggestion
that countries using nuclear energy consider that its use
should increase. The RUSSIAN FEDERATION proposed text
underlining some of the perceived advantages of nuclear power.
On recommendations for
nuclear energy, the G-77/CHINA, opposed by the EU, said
governments should be encouraged "to consider" the
listed activities. On promoting a high level of nuclear safety
"worldwide," the G-77/CHINA said this should be
"by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),"
while the EU preferred that this be in accordance with
relevant international conventions and IAEA standards. The
G-77/CHINA objected to "worldwide." On improving the
transparency of nuclear safety-related decisions, the
G-77/CHINA proposed that this be "as appropriate."
The EU urged reference to public participation. Delegates were
unable to agree on text referring to proliferation of fissile
materials.
On the transboundary
movement of nuclear waste, NEW ZEALAND proposed IAEA language
relating to the high risk of transporting radioactive
materials and the need to improve regulations and liability
mechanisms. Supporting this, NORWAY added reference to prior
notification. JAPAN, supported by the RUSSIAN FEDERATION and
opposed by BARBADOS, presented an alternative proposal that
omits reference to "high risk, improving liability
mechanisms and prior notification." All options were
bracketed. Delegates failed to clear brackets within the draft
decision on transport on a reference to nuclear energy as a
possible source for meeting the growing needs of energy
services, as well as on the transboundary movement of nuclear
waste.
IN THE CORRIDORS
Anger and frustration at the
slow progress of talks spilled into the negotiating room late
Thursday night as delegates engaged in finger-pointing over
who was to blame for the stall in negotiations. In the
corridors, a number of participants complained about a lack of
good faith among certain negotiating groups. Several
developing country delegates objected to the numerous
last-minute textual proposals that they felt complicated
proceedings and were overly prescriptive. On the other hand,
developed countries expressed their frustration with the
G-77/China�s refusal to engage in the negotiations on
energy, with some suggesting that this may be the work of
certain OPEC members. There was also speculation that forces
intent on sabotaging the Johannesburg Summit were at work,
aiming to obstruct a positive start to the CSD-10 session.
Before the events that
unfolded in the evening, a number of observers seemed
confident that agreement would be reached on the remaining
bracketed text. Following the lack of progress in the Drafting
Group on transport, and the failure of the energy Drafting
Group to hold its meeting, some participants openly questioned
whether any decisions would in fact be taken. Others suggested
that the lack of enthusiasm in the negotiations at this
meeting has only added to questions about the CSD�s future,
with some participants predicting that this was the
"beginning of the end."
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
PLENARY:
The CSD Plenary will convene at 10:00 am in Conference Room 3
to take stock of progress in the Drafting Groups and to
consider organization of the day�s work. It is then expected
to adjourn to allow informal consultations on remaining
bracketed text. The Closing Plenary is scheduled to reconvene
at 4:00 pm in Conference Room 3.
DRAFTING GROUP III:
The Drafting Group discussing atmosphere is expected to
convene upon adjournment of Plenary at 10:30 am in Conference
Room 3 to conclude its negotiations. It is expected to address
transport issues at 2:00 pm in the same venue. |