Vol. 05 No. 150
Wednesday, 26 April 2000
On the second day of the eighth session of the Commission
on Sustainable Development, delegations and representatives of
major groups participated in the third and fourth
Multi-stakeholder Dialogues on Sustainable Agriculture, on
knowledge, globalisation and trade.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE: KNOWLEDGE FOR A SUSTAINABLE
FOOD SYSTEM
Chair Mayr introduced the third Multi-stakeholder Dialogue
on Sustainable Agriculture, focusing on knowledge for a
sustainable food system and identifying and providing for
education, training, knowledge-sharing and information needs.
OPENING STATEMENTS: Outlining some of its research and
training activities undertaken in partnership with
stakeholders, the INTERNATIONAL AGRI-FOOD NETWORK, on behalf
of industry, underlined the role of the public sector in
undertaking research and development, and in the provision of
extension, education and information activities and
independent advisory services. On behalf of farmers, the
ZAMBIA NATIONAL FARMERS UNION argued that new technologies
should not be imposed on farmers, and tabled recommendations
on, inter alia: recognition of the role of farmer
organizations in spreading knowledge; the need for more
research handbooks in indigenous languages; the role of
government in undertaking farmer-driven research; and on the
need for government to increase support to agricultural
extension and development. Challenging the CSD to ensure
better use of workers’ knowledge, the INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
FOOD, AGRICULTURAL, HOTEL RESTAURANT, CATERING, TOBACCO AND
ALLIED WORKERS’ ASSOCIATIONS recommended that trade unions
develop and implement awareness and training programmes on
sustainable agriculture and promote acceptance of core ILO
labour standards. The ECOLOGICAL CENTRE OF BRAZIL, speaking
for NGOs, recommended that governments develop policies to
raise awareness among consumers and other non-farmers,
recognize the scientific knowledge of small-scale farmers, and
sponsor conferences to identify the impact of current food
systems.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSES: NIGERIA, on behalf of the
G-77/CHINA, acknowledged the importance of: increased
stakeholder support and government funding for agricultural
training, research and capacity-building; technology
generation, adaptation and dissemination; and the
participatory approach, supported by government and the
private sector, in research and extension programmes. GERMANY
identified four issues related to sustainable agriculture:
consumer education and knowledge; the inclusion of farmers in
research activities and the incorporation of traditional
knowledge into extension services; the risk of denying
small-scale farmers access to research results due to the
current intellectual property rights (IPR) regime; and workers’
rights to a living wage and safe working conditions.
OPEN DIALOGUE: Representatives from the farming
community identified biopiracy as a major problem, and
encouraged public sector research and increased farmer
involvement in decision-making. NGOs highlighted: patenting as
an ethical issue; the loss of local knowledge; and the role of
women as custodians of traditional knowledge. Industry noted
the importance of IPRs for small businesses, and observed that
patenting is not ownership but is the right to use knowledge.
Representatives from trade unions highlighted the origin of
knowledge and innovation from workers , and fair trade.
STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS: Representatives of
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE recommended: acknowledgement of the
scientific and technical knowledge of indigenous people as a
contribution to sustainable agriculture; provision of
financial resources to develop knowledge through indigenous
peoples’ institutions; the continuation of stakeholder
dialogue at CSD sessions; participation of indigenous people
in decision-making at the national level, including a
sustainable development clearing-house mechanism managed by
indigenous people; CSD promotion of the legal recognition of
indigenous land and territories; and adoption by the CSD of
the principle of prior informed consent and the right of
indigenous people to refuse access to their knowledge. TRADE
UNION representatives recommended that: multinational
companies and governments fund education and communication
programmes; workers enjoy the right to refuse dangerous work,
to have access to information and training on pesticide use,
and to collective bargaining; and highlighted the role of the
artistic community in supporting education for sustainable
development. FARMERS’ groups called for: recognition that
local and traditional knowledge is a fundamental basis of
scientific research; partnerships; the popular dissemination
of knowledge; farmer-to-farmer processes to encourage
innovation; a global system to make information freely
available; and support for negotiations on free access to
genetic resources. INDUSTRY representatives called for:
improved budgets for agricultural research; and recognition of
the role of the internet in information dissemination, and
that of agricultural cooperatives in knowledge and technology
sharing. NGO representatives called for: professional training
in indigenous science and agro-ecology; stronger indigenous
farmers’ networks; recognition that the maintenance of
knowledge and biodiversity in the public domain are key to
SARD objectives; attention to issues surrounding the ownership
of knowledge; a shift in the use of resources to support
sustainable food systems; and full access to product
information for consumers.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE: GLOBALIZATION, TRADE
LIBERALIZATION AND INVESTMENT PATTERNS
Chair Mayr introduced the fourth Multi-stakeholder Dialogue
on Sustainable Agriculture, focusing on globalization, trade
liberalization and investment patterns, economic incentives
and framework conditions to promote sustainable agriculture.
OPENING STATEMENTS: On behalf of industry, the GROCERY
MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA expressed the support of the agri-food
businesses for sustainable agriculture development through
market-oriented approaches that promote social and
environmental responsibility. She called for the progressive
elimination of trade barriers and new channels for
partnership, noting progress made through voluntary
initiatives and codes of conduct. The INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION
OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS, speaking for farmers, identified
six elements that comprise the necessary framework conditions
for sustainable agriculture: a stable policy environment;
essential rural infrastructure; an appropriate regulatory
framework; effective stakeholder participation; increased
resources for agricultural development; and effective
technology transfer.
Speaking for trade unions, the UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL
WORKERS emphasized the importance of employment policies that
alleviate poverty and address social aspects of sustainable
development. She called for new approaches to target-setting
and monitoring, and endorsement of the new ILO health and
safety convention.
The THIRD WORLD NETWORK, on behalf of NGOs, highlighted the
shift of economic control to transnational corporations (TNCs),
the dependence of farmers on chemicals supplied by TNCs, and
the rapid concentration of wealth and power. She underscored
the need to reassess globalization.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSES: Emphasizing the protectionist
implications of multifunctionality, SOUTH AFRICA called on
developed countries to remove trade distorting agricultural
policies. AUSTRALIA emphasized the need for targeted policies,
such as community-based partnerships. The EU called for
careful consideration of the purpose of subsidies. GERMANY
said the future trade agenda should address IPR, special
treatment of developing countries within the WTO, and the role
of the WTO’s rules in enhancing social conditions in
developing countries. The UNITED STATES described the role of
government in enabling farmers to thrive in a consumer-driven
economy. The EU, with SWEDEN’s support, highlighted a
commitment to duty- and quota-free access for essentially all
exports from less developed countries.
OPEN DIALOGUE: INDUSTRY representatives identified the
need to progressively reduce price supports, noting that
farmers would need time to adjust to the new framework
conditions. Representatives of NGOs and FARMERS’
groups highlighted the high level of agricultural protection
and subsidies in developed countries, and called for special
and differential treatment for developing countries.
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’s representatives noted the inability of
many indigenous peoples to compete in the current market
because of historical patterns of oppression, and called for
amendment of the WTO rules. TRADE UNION delegates
called for removal of trade distorting subsidies, reform of
trade rules to provide for sustainable development and worker
rights, and inclusion of reference to "waged agricultural
workers" in documents on SARD and the Multifunctional
Character of Agriculture and Land (MFCAL).
STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS (1): INDUSTRY
representatives supported: the reduction of subsidies and the
end of protectionism; a more cohesive international framework
for trade and sustainable development; and a clear dispute
system regarding issues arising at the WTO and in multilateral
environmental agreements. TRADE UNION representatives
supported: differentiated subsidies; a review of trade and
investment rules to protect the rights of workers, small-scale
farmers and consumers; a determination by delegations at CSD-8
to incorporate sustainable development practices, including
core labour standards, into trade agreements and guidelines at
the IMF and the World Bank; and an open process for public
debate during trade negotiations to ensure participation
before agreements are imposed unjustly on workers, consumers
and farmers. FARMERS’ representatives underlined the need to
distinguish between trade distorting and non-trade distorting
subsidies, and outlined the need for different levels of
government involvement in policies to address the impacts of
trade on agriculture, ecology and society. The representatives
of NGOs called for an in-depth evaluation of the impact of
trade liberalization and a moratorium on WTO negotiations in
the interim.
STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS (2): Chair Mayr invited
participants to address the question of how to direct
investment to developing countries in support of sustainable
agriculture. A representative of FARMERS underlined the need
for investment in agro-processing facilities to add value to
local produce and reduce local demand for primary products.
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE representatives called for the
democratization of national institutions to ensure that
investments reach people on the ground, and for the worldwide
democratization of land holdings. NGOs called for: the
targeting of investment to support local economic development;
the defeat of attempts at the WTO to restrict governments�
ability to privilege local investment; and the cancellation of
debt. INDUSTRY representatives called for the promotion of
relative freedom of investment and free trade, nationally and
internationally. TRADE UNION representatives called for
transition programmes, compensation, retraining and employment
measures for the rural sector.
CONCLUSION OF STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUES: Chair Mayr thanked
all the participants and described the four meetings as a
confidence building process. He explained that the outcomes
would be presented to Ministers attending CSD-8.
IN THE CORRIDORS
Three candidates to host the ten-year review of UNCED have
emerged. The Republic of Korea reportedly announced its
readiness to host the event in 2002 at a private meeting on
Tuesday. They will join the other contenders, Brazil and South
Africa. There is also speculation about Indonesian interest in
hosting the event. NGOs are pressing for the ten-year review
to be held outside New York to help ensure that there is no
repeat of the UNGASS meltdown.