Vol. 05 No. 149
Tuesday, 25 April 2000
The eighth session of the Commission on Sustainable
Development (CSD-8) opened today at UN Headquarters in New
York. Chair Juan Mayr (Colombia) urged delegations to use the
session as an opportunity for frank, sincere and transparent
dialogue, noting the international deadlock on a number of the
issues for consideration. After addressing procedural matters
and listening to reports of intersessional activities in the
morning, participants engaged in Multi-stakeholder Dialogues
on Agriculture and Sustainable Development in the afternoon
and evening.
OPENING PLENARY
Chair Mayr declared the session open and invited delegates
to consider the election of officers. He recalled that the
election of one Vice-Chair of the CSD-8 Bureau had been
postponed in 1999, and reported that African states had agreed
to nominate Abderrahmane Merouane (Algeria). Merouane was
elected to sit on the CSD-8 Bureau with Mayr, and Vice-Chairs
Patrick McDonnell (Ireland), Zvetolyub Basmajiev (Bulgaria)
and Choi Seok-young (Republic of Korea).
Nitin Desai, UN Under Secretary-General for Economic and
Social Affairs (DESA), described his expectations of the
session, including: practical guidelines for the effective
integration of economic, ecological and social dimensions of
land and agriculture; a move beyond rhetoric on ways to
address declining ODA; a new focus on trade and environment;
and guidance for ECOSOC and the UN General Assembly on the
follow up to the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF).
Chair Mayr outlined the organization of work for CSD-8,
noting the establishment of three drafting groups: Integrated
Planning and Management of Land Resources, and on Agriculture,
to be chaired by Patrick McDonnell; Financial Resources and
Mechanisms on Economic Growth, Trade and Investment, to be
chaired by Choi Seok-young; and Preparations for Rio+10, to be
chaired by Zvetolyub Basmajiev. On the High Level Segment,
Chair Mayr noted that there would be five thematic meetings.
The organization of work (E/CN.17/ 2000/1) was accepted.
REPORTS OF THE AD HOC INTERSESSIONAL WORKING
GROUPS: The report of the Ad Hoc Inter-sessional
Working Group (ISWG) on Integrated Planning and Management of
Land Resources, and on Agriculture (E/CN.17/2000/11) was
presented by ISWG Co-Chair Patrick McDonnell. He highlighted, inter
alia: implementation of sustainable agriculture and rural
development (SARD) goals; the multi-functional character of
agriculture (MFCAL); access to land and security of tenure;
and security of food supply. ISWG Co-Chair Choi Seok-young
summarized the report of the Ad Hoc Intersessional
Working Group on Financial Resources and Mechanisms and on
Economic Growth, Trade and Investment. He noted elements for a
draft decision identified during the meeting and stated that
work in this area is crucial for the ten-year review of UNCED.
REPORTS OF INTERSESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: The NETHERLANDS
outlined the challenges, objectives and results of the
Cultivating Our Futures Conference on MFCAL, held in the
Netherlands in September 1999, and called for an
action-oriented solution. AUSTRALIA summarized outcomes from
the Land Care Conference held in March 2000, which addressed
the sectoral theme of integrated planning and management of
land resources. He noted the role of local and indigenous
communities in land management and progress made in developing
and implementing solutions. He highlighted the creation of a
land care clearing-house in Canberra. AUSTRALIA described an
international workshop on land administration and sustainable
development and introduced the Bathurst Declaration. A UN DESA
representative presented the results of the first
International Forum of National Sustainable Development
Councils, which met in New York during the week before CSD-8.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE: PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES,
CONSUMPTION AND SAFETY
Chair Mayr introduced the first Multi-stakeholder Dialogue
on Sustainable Agriculture, focusing on choices in
agricultural production techniques, consumption patterns and
safety regulations, and potential threats to sustainable
agriculture.
OPENING STATEMENTS: On behalf of business, the
INTERNATIONAL AGRI-FOOD NETWORK identified integrated farming
techniques as the most appropriate way of achieving
sustainability, and welcomed government intervention adapted
to local conditions. On behalf of farmers, the INTERNATIONAL
FEDERATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS and VIA CAMPESINA
emphasized the importance of regenerative agriculture, and
urged governments and international agencies to focus
agricultural policy on small-scale and peasant farming. The
INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF FREE TRADE UNIONS emphasized
the need to: support the work of the International Labour
Organisation (ILO); promote worker participation in
decision-making; and identify the impacts of biotechnology on
employment. The NGO CAUCUS ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
SYSTEMS, speaking for NGOs, women and indigenous people,
recommended, inter alia: focusing on small farmers;
improving food security through adoption of appropriate land
tenure; supporting the trend toward organic agriculture;
completing and ratifying the Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs); implementing a moratorium on environmental
releases of all genetically modified organisms (GMOs);
removing agricultural subsidies; and supporting the consumer’s
right to know.
OPEN DIALOGUE: Noting the need for drought resistant
crops, EGYPT advocated the use of new technologies where
safety can be guaranteed. The NETHERLANDS highlighted global
food security and called for action-oriented proposals from
the CSD. NIGERIA, speaking on behalf of the G-77/CHINA,
highlighted the debt burden of developing countries. The
UNITED STATES outlined five principles to guide a framework
for biotechnology: an objective regulatory process, consumer
involvement, fairness to farmers, corporate citizenship, and
free and open trade. CANADA supported building effective
biosafety regulatory systems in developing countries.
STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS: Representatives of TRADE
UNIONS recommended that: the concepts of SARD and MFCAL
recognize waged agricultural workers as a distinct group; core
labour standards be reflected in the work of the CSD and in
the SARD and MFCAL concepts; and that greater safety and
protection from pesticides be provided to workers.
NGO representatives offered recommendations on: the
question of liability in the introduction of GMOs; the right
of farmers to save their agricultural seeds; the creation of a
multi-stakeholder working group to study indicators of
sustainable agriculture; the revival of local knowledge and
techniques; the commitment of fifty per cent of agricultural
research funding and seventy per cent of project funding to
organic production; a commitment by the FAO to allocate fifty
per cent of its funding and staff resources to sustainable and
organic farming within three years; a shift of university
research funding to organic farming studies; the application
of the precautionary principle; and implementation of a
moratorium on technologies that pose a perceived risk.
Representatives of INDIGENOUS PEOPLE offered recommendations
on: the need for a moratorium on GMO field trials; government
and inter-governmental support for the sustainable
agricultural practices of indigenous people; government and
international respect for land rights in support of
sustainable agriculture; the need for a working group with
representation from indigenous people, women, and the
exploited; and the need for land tenure mechanisms
guaranteeing access to productive land. INDUSTRY representatives
recommended that: deliberations on organic farming and GMOs
advance on the basis of sound science and not
"emotionalism"; countries build capacity to
implement informed and science-based regulatory biosafety
procedures; indicators be developed to assess the respective
impacts of organic agriculture and biotechnology approaches on
sustainability; and that innovation be driven by need. FARMERS’
representatives recommended that: equal amounts of
financial support go to genetic engineering and small-scale
farmers; governments increase public-sector investment in
agricultural research; governments develop a sound regulatory
framework for GMOs and organic products, with
multi-stakeholder participation in the design; secure land
tenure be recognized as the best incentive for sustainable
agriculture; and that governments recognize the necessity of
shared responsibility for the higher production costs of
sustainable agriculture.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE: BEST PRACTICES IN LAND
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Chair Mayr introduced the second Multi-stakeholder
Dialogue, focusing on best practices in land resources
management to achieve sustainable food cycles.
OPENING STATEMENTS: Noting the need for greater
cultivation intensity and higher yields, the INTERNATIONAL
AGRI-FOOD NETWORK highlighted the role of biotechnology, and
emphasized that sustainable agriculture be adapted to provide
for local demographic, technical and socio-economic
conditions. The INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AGRICULTURAL
PRODUCERS and VIA CAMPESINA called for policy measures
promoting sustainable agricultural practices, including equal
access to credit for small-scale farmers, partnership
programmes, and the promotion of organic products. The
INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF FREE TRADE UNIONS called for
guidelines for multinational corporations in the food system,
and recommended using capital flows for capacity building. The
NGO CAUCUS ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS
recommended removing subsidies, improving integration between
agricultural and rural development policies, ensuring
equitable land tenure, redistributing quality land, and
promoting the role of small-scale farmers. He called on
industry to define "sustainable agriculture".
GOVERNMENT RESPONSES: Emphasizing the multi-functional
character of agriculture, JAPAN highlighted the public sector�s
role in providing information and technology.
STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS: INDUSTRY representatives
proposed recommendations calling for public policies that:
preserve yields; ensure dignified wages for workers and fair
markets for producers; and encourage cooperation among all
sectors. NGOs tabled recommendations calling for: resources
for research into agro-ecology; the creation of a working
group on land management issues, with a mandate to meet until
CSD-10; the development of national and international legal
mechanisms, reflecting land tenure as a prerequisite for SARD;
the creation of national and international instruments to
recognize traditional agricultural practices; and ratification
of a POPs convention and relevant climate change agreements.
TRADE UNIONS recommended: establishing agricultural workers�
rights; linking other sectors to agriculture; addressing
cross-boundary pollution; and linking production and
consumption patterns through an integrated food system.
FARMERS representatives called for: the identification of best
practices for analysis; national government support for local
farmers in obtaining capital; measures to protect present
sustainable agriculture activities; and the incorporation of
the precautionary principle in agricultural policies.
IN THE CORRIDORS
A number of participants are questioning the shelf life of
the stakeholder contributions to the dialogues on sustainable
agriculture. They are asking whether the stakeholder
recommendations will find their way into proposals to be
negotiated in the CSD-8 drafting groups. Concerns have also
been raised about the extensive focus on biotechnology at the
expense of debate on other issues.