Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development
(IISD)
Vol. 4 No. 158
Thursday, 11 October 2001
CCD COP-5 HIGHLIGHTS:
WEDNESDAY, 10 OCTOBER 2001
Delegates met in morning and evening
sessions to conclude the High Level Special Segment, and also adopted a
draft decision on the fourth interparliamentary Round Table. Delegates
also met in the afternoon for an open NGO dialogue to consider the
inclusion of NGOs within the official COP work programme. Informal
contact groups on the committee for the review of implementation (CRIC)
and on programme and budget issues continued, but did not conclude their
deliberations.
HIGH LEVEL SPECIAL SEGMENT
During the morning session, delegates
at the High Level Special Segment adopted a draft COP decision on the
fourth Round Table of Parliamentarians (ICCD/COP(5)/L.13). The
Parliamentarian Declaration notes, inter alia, deep alarm at
increasing environmental degradation, particularly desertification,
which "threatens the very basis of life on earth," and affirms
the commitment to contribute fully to CCD implementation, including
support for making land degradation a GEF focal area. The COP decision
takes note of the Declaration and annexes it to the COP-5 report.
GENERAL STATEMENTS:
COP-5 President Charles Basset opened the final day of the High Level
Special Segment on CCD implementation. Many speakers highlighted
NAP-related activities and noted the linkages between the CCD and other
MEAs. Developing country representatives, in particular, called for more
financial support and capacity building. A number of delegates welcomed
a GEF proposal to designate land degradation as a focal area for
funding. The role of civil society and NGOs was also recognized.
SENEGAL highlighted the benefits of
decentralization in helping local communities manage their resources,
and YEMEN reported on the role of its Ministry of Agriculture and
Irrigation as a desertification focal point. INDIA outlined the
cross-sectoral Integrated Watershed Programme and land rejuvenation and
stressed the need to empower women. Noting its numerous historical and
cultural heritage sites threatened by desertification, MYANMAR
elaborated on its Three-Year Greening Project. SYRIA linked
desertification issues to military occupation and emphasized the need
for peace and respect for civil rights in land rehabilitation. ITALY
said the GEF should not be the sole funding source for the CCD and
announced a doubling of Italy’s voluntary contribution.
The UN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR
DISASTER REDUCTION called for strengthening synergies with the CCD, and
between disaster destruction strategies and socio-economic and
humanitarian fields. The LEAGUE OF ARAB STATES called for securing
funding to implement monitoring and rehabilitation activities. BOTSWANA
said resources should be made available to strengthen the capacity of
the Secretariat and GM. The ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY called for
predictable financial resources for CCD implementation.
The ARAB ORGANIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT supported regional and subregional coordination and the
preparation of NAPs, and the RAMSAR CONVENTION highlighted linkages with
the CCD through, inter alia, cooperation on the Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment and at the country level.
PALESTINE reported difficulties in
combating desertification and land degradation due to the
"occupation and military blockade." The INTERNATIONAL CENTER
FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS reported on its work to
improve germplasm and natural resource management. ETHIOPIA stressed the
importance of financial support to effectively implement NAPs. ARGENTINA
highlighted the participatory process in combating desertification, and
noted its involvement in South-South cooperation. BURUNDI emphasized
grassroots activities and called on Parties to mobilize more resources.
Noting their geographic isolation,
SAMOA and FIJI called for assistance in formulating integrated
subregional and regional programmes. CYPRUS stressed the need for
increased public awareness and the inclusion of civil society in
combating desertification.
RWANDA noted efforts to fight poverty,
food insecurity and environmental degradation following the 1994
genocide. PAKISTAN called for technical and financial support. The
REPUBLIC OF KOREA highlighted constraints in accessing technology, and
noted the involvement of its private sector in CCD implementation.
CAPE VERDE said it had started
implementing its NAP, although resource mobilization remains a key
issue. INDONESIA recommended that COP-5 adopt decisions that would
ensure an appropriate focus on desertification at the WSSD. EGYPT
stressed the need to avoid duplication of work, and CAMBODIA highlighted
intensifying drought and flooding as a result of soil erosion. The
GAMBIA noted the importance of a cross-sectoral legal framework, and
ALGERIA highlighted cross-boundary aspects of desertification and close
integration of its NAP and SRAP. BANGLADESH focused on population
density and the need to increase land productivity, while ISRAEL
highlighted its efforts to promote regional coordination.
OPEN NGO DIALOGUE:
COP-5 President Basset invited NGO representatives and government
delegates to discuss civil society involvement in CCD implementation.
CCD Executive Secretary Diallo highlighted the need for civil society
involvement in the preparation of national reports and action
programmes.
Zakiya Uzoma-Wadada (Caribbean Network
for Integrated Rural Development) outlined key requirements for
effective NGO consultation, and expressed hope that this dialogue would
produce tangible recommendations and results. Tsaruk Oleg (International
Central Asian Network on Biodiversity) highlighted NGO integration in
government efforts as a result of CCD activities, but noted obstacles
related to the legal status of NGOs and allocation of project funds.
Jürgen Gliese (AG Desertifikation/Forum Umwelt & Entwicklung)
presented results from a survey of German NGOs noting, inter alia,
low awareness of linkages with the CCD, need for capacity building at
the government and NGO levels in developing countries, and the value of
support for NGO involvement in policy making.
Octavio Perez Pardo of ARGENTINA said
civil society organizations (CSOs) can play an important role in:
ensuring continuity of CCD implementation, despite changes in government
administrations; creating CCD awareness among peers; and channeling
resources to local activities. Sina Maiga (Association de Formation et d’Appui
au Dévéloppement) and Anne Mossige (Drylands Coordination Group)
presented findings from studies in Mali and Ethiopia identifying lessons
on the participation of CSOs and local level actors in CCD
implementation. Maiga recommended that CSOs facilitate, inter alia, resource
mobilization, capacity building and training, communication, experience
sharing, and coordination with national- and regional-level actors.
Mossige reported a relative lack of civil society involvement in NAP
development in Ethiopia due to deficiencies in resources, issue
awareness and coordination. She proposed strengthening donor support and
NGO-government coordination, and mainstreaming a bottom-up approach.
Noting democratization, political
will, and adequate funding as prerequisites for active NGO involvement,
Juan Luis Mérega (Fundacion del Sur) highlighted measures to strengthen
civil society participation, including: improving NGO-government
cooperation; effecting a bottom-up approach; increasing NGO capacity to
act at a local level; and raising public awareness.
In the ensuing discussion, several
delegations, including MAURITANIA, SENEGAL and CHINA, highlighted the
useful CSO input in CCD implementation. ETHIOPIA, with others,
recommended, inter alia: that donors earmark a significant
percentage of desertification-related funding for government and civil
society activities at the local level and assist affected country
Parties develop monitoring mechanisms; and that affected Parties
allocate a significant percentage of funds to addressing social and
environmental issues relating to land degradation, and clearly identify
stakeholders’ roles and responsibilities. Several subsequent speakers
endorsed these recommendations. SWEDEN drew attention to work on
indicators already undertaken by the Global Coalition for Africa. NORWAY
called for government-NGO cooperation in developing indicators and, with
DENMARK, emphasized NGO capacity building. SENEGAL called for models of
effective partnerships with NGOs and with vulnerable groups.
MALI, NIGER and BURKINA FASO
highlighted lack of funding as a critical obstacle for NGOs and for
developing country governments. The UGANDA WOMEN TREE PLANTING MOVEMENT
asked for support to the RIOD Women’s Network to showcase best
practices on CCD implementation at the WSSD. MAURITANIA challenged the
involvement of foreign NGOs in the South, where there are capable
indigenous NGOs.
Regarding CSO-NGO collaboration,
ENDA-TM said perceptions about CSOs need to be altered so that the
complementary roles of NGOs and governments are recognized. UZBEKISTAN
called for a pragmatic and business-like relationship, while RIOD
EASTERN EUROPE labeled collaboration a "one-sided love
affair," and urged closer collaboration and a focus on joint
programmes. The SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF THE
ENVIROMENT noted the absence of CSOs at the provincial and national
levels.
Underscoring the difficult role of
NGOs in both expressing and shaping the opinions of those they
represent, COP-5 President Basset said a Chair’s summary of the
discussion will be produced, incorporating the proposals made by
Ethiopia.
CONTACT GROUPS
The contact group on programme and
budget addressed substantive issues including NAP implementation, CRIC
and CST support, synergies with other conventions, and WSSD preparation.
Some delegates expressed concerns at the lack of progress, as new
proposals have been introduced, and questioned whether it will be
possible to conclude work by the close of COP-5. New proposals for the
budget increase now range from 0% to 30%. Other disputed issues included
budget priorities, and whether to determine the overall budget level
before determining priority areas for spending.
Informal consultations between the US
and the CST bureau to resolve language on Annex I of the draft decision
on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the CST
(ICCD/COP(5)/L.7) were also held on Tuesday, with participants reaching
agreement on outstanding issues. Negotiators agreed that the group of
experts to be established under the CST will be selected by the CST
Bureau on a one-time basis, and subsequently will be selected by the CST
body for COP approval. The group’s programme of work will last four
years, after which time its functioning will be reviewed. The
composition will be based on equitable geographical distribution.
IN THE CORRIDORS
Despite claims that the CCD is one of
the most NGO-friendly MEAs, some participants have observed a relatively
low NGO profile at COP-5. As delegates stressed the importance of civil
society in the High Level Special Segment, several NGOs noted,
ironically, that they had been confined to the gallery for most of its
sessions. Other NGO representatives were disappointed at the low
attendance at the second NGO dialogue and the absence of the kind of
participatory role enjoyed in past COPs and in other MEAs. Nonetheless,
several participants observed that, in spite of these reported
difficulties, NGOs have been working diligently and successfully behind
the scenes, forwarding their recommendations through country
representatives.
Commenting on the morning High Level
Special Segment, some observers expressed surprise that the report of
the Round Table of Parliamentarians was introduced and adopted, noting
that it was not on the agenda, and that the decision should have been
channeled through the COW.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
COW: The COW
will resume at 10:00 am and 3:00 pm in Conference Room XVIII to consider
the review of the report and specific conclusions and recommendations of
the GM, review of activities for the promotion and strengthening of
relationships with other relevant conventions, international
organizations and agencies, and to consider Rule 47 under the Rules of
Procedure.
CONTACT GROUPS: The
contact group on the CRIC and programme and budget are expected to meet
again Thursday.
|