Published by the International
Institute for Sustainable Development
(IISD) Vol. 04 No. 124 Wednesday,
December 09 1998
CCD COP-2 HIGHLIGHTS
TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 1998
Eleven ministers, 25 government officials and 5 IO
representatives addressed the ways and means to promote the
timely and effective implementation of the Convention
(ICCD/COP(2)/5) during morning and afternoon sessions of the
Special Segment. The COW and non-groups also met during the
morning and afternoon, respectively.
SPECIAL SEGMENT
Many speakers highlighted national activities under their
NAPs. ALGERIA's national efforts include the monitoring and
remote sensing of sensitive regions. Concerns of NIGER's
grassroots actors include their lack of alternative sources of
energy to firewood. EL SALVADOR said natural catastrophes must
remind Parties of their commitment to protect the environment.
He noted activities in the framework of regional cooperation in
Latin America. TOGO stressed that it was time to take stock of
the progress since COP-1 and urged Parties to continue to
prepare their NAPs. NEPAL stressed that development should focus
on people and their surroundings and those development
activities should be designed to alleviate poverty. TANZANIA's
national experience indicates the importance of political
willingness and strong mechanisms for awareness raising,
harmonized cross-cutting activities, technical support and clear
elaboration of partnership arrangements, and reliable and
sustainable financial arrangements. JAMAICA called attention to
the problems and needs of small island developing States.
SENEGAL said implementation requires the full participation
of the local communities. NORWAY said women's participation is
vital for the success of the CCD. CAPE VERDE has named 2000 the
Year of Desertification for the country and will promote public
awareness. CHILE said its national policies have been
consolidated at very local levels. SYRIA has set up over 30
reserves to protect land. IRAN discussed family planning in
relation to desertification. UNDP stressed its continuous
support of capacity building in affected countries.
INDIA has offered to host a regional network on Agro-forestry
Management and Soil Conservation. UZBEKISTAN discussed national
efforts to meet its challenges, including efforts to shift away
from cotton as a single crop. ARMENIA supported adding a fifth
annex to the CCD. KAZAKHSTAN noted desertification is an inter-
state problem and discussed joint efforts with neighboring
countries. SPAIN noted its support of projects in Africa and
Latin America. ETHIOPIA underscored the need to incorporate
desertification into the national sustainable development
strategy. MALI discussed national reforms to decentralize and
allow local authorities to participate in land management
decision making. FINLAND believed NAPs should cover all social
and economic aspects. MAURITANIA called for regional
coordinating units in Africa, Asia and Latin America and the
Caribbean. MOROCCO noted that the headquarters of the
Sahara/Sahel Observatory (OSS), of which it serves as chair,
will be transferred from Paris to Tunis. CILSS said organized
actors of Sahelian civil society, particularly farmers and NGOs,
are actively involved in the preparation of NAPs and state and
civil society relations are also developing positively. CHINA
said effective implementation requires countries to: become
aware of the importance and urgency of strengthening
coordination and cooperation; actively promote funding and
technology transfer from developed to affected developing
countries; strengthen South-South cooperation; explore and apply
new technology; educate and mobilize people in the affected
areas; and encourage the initiatives of local communities and
social partners.
The EU said affected countries are in the best position to
steer the process and highlighted NAPs as important instruments
to provide such guidance. SWITZERLAND said the NAP provides a
light for global development policy, which consistency and
efficiency demand. The EC noted that the experience of the
Sahelian countries in managing the drought of the 1970s lends
valuable lessons for the affected countries. ITALY proposed that
a "mandate of Dakar" lead to a protocol with specific
commitments at COP-4 once all regional action plans are
approved.
Financing for implementation and institutional issues were
also addressed. The G-77/CHINA reaffirmed its determination to
combat desertification, but added that international cooperation
on financing is essential. The EU has been and will continue to
be a major source of financing for the CCD, and will seek to
make resource use more efficient and help the GM mobilize
resources. FRANCE appealed to bilateral and multilateral donors
to increase funds for combating desertification and called for
more efficient use of resources.
The GEF Council has stipulated that its operational strategy
should include land degradation as an integral part of its
activities. A new GEF initiative, "dialogue workshops," will
offer workshops on project identification, how to access GEF
resources and the GEF project cycle. SWEDEN outlined a six-step
process for building operational partnerships, starting with a
bottom-up preparation process in affected countries and
progressing through the identification of prospective donors,
launching of the NAP, and dialogues on the NAP with donors. The
EC stressed the need to ensure that local communities have the
necessary resources to combat desertification.
BENIN called on his partners to mobilize resources through
the GM and noted the value of the Secretariat's initiatives and
actions. IFAD requested the COP to deliver policy guidance for
its dynamic and potential development. ERITREA called for the
timely and full operation of the GM. PAKISTAN expressed hope
that its national fund to combat desertification would receive
adequate assistance from donors. MOROCCO said effective and
swift implementation of the CCD requires furnishing the
permanent Secretariat with the means to carry out its role,
ensuring the swift functioning of the GM, and implementing NAPs
with the participation of partners and the GM.
The G-77/CHINA said a strong Secretariat is the essential and
key machinery for implementation. MAURITANIA said the CCD
Secretariat must be given the freedom to implement its
responsibilities. GERMANY said it has done its share to
facilitate the timely operation of the permanent Secretariat in
January 1999. KAZAKHSTAN commended the Secretariat's work on
benchmarks and indicators and expressed an interest in testing
the methodology. FINLAND said the Secretariat should continue to
be active in promoting implementation of RAPs and NAPs.
The EU said the CST should provide usable advice, develop a
structured work programme and complement related work undertaken
by other bodies. The US said the COP, CST and GM should work
together and focus on identifying and channeling resources to
those most in need as efficiently and expeditiously as possible.
ITALY said the FCCC's flexible mechanism could be a useful
tool for CCD-related efforts. TOGO noted the synergies between
the Rio conventions and called for cooperation to harmonize
actions at the national and regional levels. The FCCC suggested
coordination with the CCD on logistics and administrative
arrangements. He called for an integrated scientific vision and
said he relied on strengthened UNEP capacities to achieve this.
He also said he hoped to relaunch the integration of national
reports within the three Rio conventions.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The COW considered the promotion and strengthening of
relationships with other relevant conventions, procedures and
institutional mechanisms for the resolution of implementation
issues and an annex on arbitration and conciliation procedures.
The Secretariat introduced document ICCD/COP(2)/7 (collaboration
and synergies among Rio conventions for the implementation of
the CCD). He said the document gives an account of the rationale
for cooperation with other conventions, elaborates a joint pilot
initiative, reviews the main areas for synergies and proposes
further steps to enhance cooperation among convention
secretariats while advancing their effective implementation.
The G-77/CHINA, supported by GRULAC, EGYPT and INDIA,
underscored the enhancement and strengthening of cooperation
activities between conventions and said issues regarding
institutional cooperation are still under the General Assembly's
consideration. The EU noted the recommendations outlined in the
chapter on "Greater coherence in various intergovernmental
organizations and processes" of the Rio+5 document, and called
for actions to make these steps a reality to avoid duplication
and increase efficiency. EGYPT suggested including terms of
reference for financial cooperation between the GEF and IFAD.
INDIA stressed the importance of preserving biodiversity through
the CCD and said the patenting issue and its related importance
in terms of the WTO agreement should be reflected in the
document. ICELAND noted the tendency under the FCCC to limit
discussions on sinks to forestry activities and supported
including, in the scientific and technical linkages section,
restoration of degraded lands that would serve the objectives of
both the FCCC and CCD. The Secretariat noted the interventions
and said improved coordination and synergies at the field level
will be reflected in future endeavors.
Regarding procedures and institutional mechanisms to resolve
questions on implementation and an annex on arbitration and
conciliation procedures, the Secretariat introduced document
ICCD/COP(2)/10 and noted that the adoption of annexes would
require an amendment to the Convention as outlined in CCD
Article 30. The G-77/CHINA said that, compared with the FCCC,
which has recently decided to establish a multilateral
consultation process, the CCD is a young convention and the
development of such a process would require further discussion.
Regarding the annex, he called for the establishment of an ad
hoc experts group to discuss the issue and refer it to COP-3.
The EU said such procedures should be simple, facilitative,
non-confrontational, cooperative, consultative and, supported by
JUSCANZ, tailored to the circumstances of the Convention. The EU
and JUSCANZ called on the Secretariat to compile submissions for
COP-3, taking into account other conventions' experiences.
JUSCANZ said the establishment of an ad hoc group was premature
and that the COP should proceed in phases, the first being a
compilation of views for consideration at COP-3.
MAURITANIA and CHINA said the G-77/CHINA and EU/JUSCANZ
positions were not necessarily contradictory. MAURITANIA said
COP-2 could agree to refer discussion of this issue to an open-
ended ad hoc group that would discuss and make recommendations
at COP-3 and in the interim compile views to form the basis for
the discussions. EGYPT and CHINA stressed that a compilation of
views alone was insufficient and that an open-ended working
group was indispensable for discussion. SYRIA said
implementation of the Convention must occur first, particularly
progress on the GM's operation, and only then could the COP
predict disputes that might arise and adopt appropriate
procedures.
IN THE CORRIDORS
The non-group on legal issues discussed the proposed decision
on the review of implementation of the Convention during the
afternoon. The G-77/China proposed the establishment of a
Committee on the review of the implementation of the Convention
but other delegates preferred to address the issue at COP-3, as
had been agreed in Decision 10/COP.1. A Secretariat draft
reflects this latter view and invites Parties to make
submissions in writing by 30 April 1999. The group also reached
agreement on the headquarters agreement following bilateral
contacts between the G-77/China and EU. The implementation non-
group agreed to text on ordinary sessions of the COP and
regional action programmes.
The contact group on budget issues is reported to be close to
agreement. Participants reported that one of the German
contributions will be transferred to a special fund and offset
by Secretariat savings, given the lower cost-of-living in Bonn.
As a result, Party contributions will remain roughly the same.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
PLENARY: Twenty-six speakers on ways and means to promote the
timely and effective implementation of the Convention are
expected during morning and afternoon sessions of the Special
Segment.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE: The COW may meet in the afternoon.
NON-GROUPS: The non-groups established to negotiate the draft
decisions for the COW have been instructed to complete their
work before Wednesday evening.
|