A Clearing House
for Information on the Convention to Combat Desertification
Presented by the
International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
[ Linkages
Home ][ Send
Feedback ]
HIGHLIGHTS OF CCD COP-1 TUESDAY, 7 OCTOBER 1997
Delegates to COP-1 met in Plenary to hear statements from
Ministers, in the Committee of the Whole (COW) to consider
draft decisions, and in informal consultations to discuss
the administrative arrangements for the Global Mechanism.
PLENARY
Delegates heard thirty-four statements during the High-
Level Segment. Twenty-two Ministers, 5 Deputy-Ministers and
7 other officials spoke.
CCD AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: The G-77 and CHINA said
the CCD is the first international convention to address
environmental destruction and poverty in rural areas. The
EU and NIGER stressed the role of the CCD in attaining food
security. NIGER added that desertification is a global
challenge requiring North-South and South-South cooperation
and the development of synergies between the other Rio
Conventions. MAURITANIA stressed the equality of the CCD
with the conventions on biological diversity, climate
change and the Montreal Protocol. FRANCE said the UNGASS
meeting showed that the Rio process had run out of steam
and hoped the CCD's entry into force will demonstrate a
desire to compensate for that.
RESOURCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: ITALY called for measures
supporting the North-South transfer of technology, the
joint implementation of commitments and the adequate
provision of financial resources. CHINA noted the
importance of international cooperation, the creation of an
internal and external enabling environment, South-South
cooperation and science and technology. IRAN, COTE
d'IVOIRE, JORDAN and ALGERIA stressed the need for
technical and financial support. GHANA said Africa still is
in an emergency situation although the period for urgent
measures has expired. TURKEY offered to share its expertise
and said it is open to technology transfer. MONGOLIA said
developed countries must meet their financial commitments.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: The EU is the largest donor, having
committed more than US$2.2 million to desertification
programmes. LUXEMBOURG has contributed US$1 million to a
World Bank trust fund to combat desertification. The UK
highlighted its new development philosophy and activities
that demonstrate its commitment to the CCD, including debt
cancellation and provision of over GBP 21 million for new
anti-desertification activities. FRANCE will mobilize
additional funds for desertification activities. The
NETHERLANDS said the "lead donor" idea can give meaning to
partnerships and noted that it is serving in that capacity
in Burkina Faso. GERMANY is implementing several hundred
desertification projects in all regions. SPAIN plans to
contribute to the CST by serving as a leader for specific
programmes, such as the development of indicators. It will
also make new contributions towards the CCD for
implementation in Latin America.
CCD RATIFICATION: All EU member States have ratified the
CCD and the Commission will ratify it in a few weeks.
FRANCE appealed to major developed countries who have not
yet ratified the CCD. The US said the Senate's failure to
ratify does not reflect a lack of commitment to the CCD,
and said it provided US$33.5 million for CCD-relevant
activities. RUSSIA will continue efforts to ratify the CCD,
but stressed the need for a fifth CCD annex for Central and
Eastern European States and called for negotiations to
begin immediately.
GLOBAL MECHANISM: The G-77 and CHINA was pleased that the
Global Mechanism (GM) will have its own resources.
MAURITANIA supported a GM that offers an effective tool to
provide resources for field programmes. MADAGASCAR said the
GM is a necessary and appropriate tool to increase
financial flows for desertification. ITALY said the GM,
housed at IFAD in Rome, is the appropriate mechanism to
identify innovative forms of financing. BENIN cited the
difficulties in designating the GM and establishing the
Committee on the Review of the Implentation of the
Convention as indicators of the need to make greater
efforts at participation and partnership, which has waned
since Rio.
PARTICIPATION: Many speakers emphasized the CCD's bottom-up
approach and need to involve all relevant actors. SWEDEN
said the CCD requires the involvement of NGOs and is for
the benefit of farmers and pastoralists, most of whom are
women. GHANA stressed that rural people have valuable
knowledge to contribute to the participatory process
designed in the CCD. BURKINA FASO said the CCD is an
example of a new moral ethic in international cooperation
that includes the innovative principles of participation
and partnership.
IMPLEMENTATION: Most speakers noted national and
international efforts to combat desertification. For
example, SYRIA is reducing the encroachment of marginal
areas through a 95,000 hectares "Green Belt" project.
MOROCCO has an information programme to promote awareness
and a strategy for livestock grazing zones. CHAD
highlighted an agreement between NGOs and the Ministry of
Water on information and awareness raising. NEPAL has given
priority to poverty elimination and sustainable
development. BRAZIL referred to its regional plan of action
with other Latin American countries. BURKINA FASO sponsored
a national forum in July 1997 to exchange views on
implementing the CCD. MADAGASCAR described its three-phase
environmental action plan. ICELAND said participants at a
recent meeting on rangelands agreed the evolution of the
CCD could be enhanced through broad-based scientific input
and the CST could benefit from the experience of the FCCC's
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The PAKISTANI
government is paying attention to the factors that
contribute to desertification, including deforestation,
mismanagement and salinization. UGANDA has prepared a draft
National Action Programme (NAP) and a project proposal for
its implementation. MONGOLIA has enacted a number of laws
concerning land use and management practices.
ITALY outlined the southern European countries' efforts to
implement common guidelines and programmes in accordance
with Annex IV of the CCD. NIGER noted the strong
cooperative arrangements between Africa and Asia in
combating desertification and highlighted the conclusions
of the second Asia-Africa Forum. CHINA noted the
Ministerial Beijing Declaration. IRAN offered to host a
regional level network for some of the thematic issues
identified at the Beijing meeting. MOROCCO said the OSS has
succeeded in developing a framework for cooperation between
North and South. LIBYA stressed the need for coordination
of international efforts to mobilize scientific and
technical resources to combat poverty and hunger. TUNISIA
has hosted meetings of African representatives to
coordinate efforts.
GERMANY asked if implementation has been limited to
workshops. He stressed the need to make poverty reduction
the focus of cooperation.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The COW met for 90 minutes to consider several, mainly
procedural, draft decisions. COW Chair El-Ghaouth noted
that decisions left pending at COP-1 would have to wait
until COP-2, which could affect countries' programmes of
work.
EXPRESSIONS OF GRATITUDE TO ITALY AND THE FAO: The COW
adopted, by acclamation, decisions ICCD/COP(1)/L.7 and L.6.
DATE AND VENUE OF COP-2: The COW adopted the draft outline
of decision ICCD/COP(1)/L.2, without naming the date or
host country for COP-2. Egypt, Senegal and the African
Group expect to reach agreement by Wednesday morning, 8
October. El-Ghaouth said the date also would depend on the
associated UN Organization.
PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE PERMANENT SECRETARIAT: Draft
decision ICCD/COP(1)/L.4 accepts the offer of Germany to
host the Secretariat in Bonn and highlights follow-up steps
for the Executive Secretary. The EU proposed text stating
that the Executive Secretary acts "for and on behalf of the
UN Organization." The EU also preferred relocation close to
but prior to 1 January 1999, and not after that date. The
Chair noted that relocation is dependent on the readiness
of the host government and subject to receipt by the
Secretariat of two contracts from the UN Organization. He
said a letter of appreciation to Switzerland would also be
needed. The EU said it needed to consult on the text, which
was adopted ad referendum.
PROGRAMME OF WORK OF THE COP: On decision ICCD/COP(1)/L.5,
the EU asked whether the programme and budget decision
would be for one or two years. El-Ghaouth said it is a
standing item on the COP agenda and elaborated using the
precedent of the FCCC. The EU revised the introductions to
subparagraphs 3 (a) and (b). The decision was adopted ad
referendum.
INTERIM ARRANGEMENTS: Decision ICCD/COP(1)/L.3 stipulates a
number of tasks for the UN Secretary-General, including the
appointment of the Head of the Secretariat. The EU said
payment for conference services should be discussed under
Programme and Budget because budgetary issues have to be
presented as a package. The position and title were left
pending.
SUPPLEMENTARY FUND AND SPECIAL FUND: The decision
(ICCD/COP(1)/L.10) mandates the establishment of two Funds
for various Convention purposes. PANAMA suggested revising
text so as not to specify the number of NGOs to be
supported. New text was added to subparagraph 2(b) to
ensure funds are used for "relevant articles of the
regional implementation annexes."
RELATIONS WITH THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY: The
decision (ICCD/COP(1)/L.12) welcomes the determination by
the GEF Council to finance land degradation activities and
invites it to report to the COP on matters relating to the
issue. Adoption of the decision was deferred to allow the
EU to consult.
DRAFT DECISION ON BEHALF OF THE LATIN AMERICAN AND
CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES: The draft decision makes four
proposals, including the adoption of agreements made by the
Region's Parties at their meetings and requests the
Executive Secretary to provide the support required for the
regional action programme and coordinating mechanism.
Discussions centred around the possibility of other regions
submitting similar decisions and the need for clarity about
the decisions the Parties would be making. The matter was
deferred to allow for EU consultations.
EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS: The decision (ICCD/COP(1)/L.11) deals
with extrabudgetary funds for the Secretariat for 1998. At
the EU's request, the decision was deferred to enable a
small group to negotiate the decision.
ESTIMATES FOR THE OPERATING EXPENSES OF THE GM: Decision
ICCD/COP(1)/L.13 notes that the expenses of the GM in 1999
are missing in the proposed budget and programme
(ICCD/COP(1)/5) and requests the Executive Secretary to
submit budget estimates to COP-2. The decision was deferred
pending conclusion of on-going informal consultations on
the GM.
IN THE CORRIDORS
Some agreement was reached in the informal discussions on
the Global Mechanism on Tuesday afternoon, 7 October. The
agreed text in the two decisions refers to: the importance
of the collaboration between the three organizations, IFAD,
UNDP and the World Bank; the transitory measures to ensure
the GM starts functioning as soon as possible; and the
relationship between the COP and the GM, where the
Secretariat is mandated to negotiate a Memorandum of
Understanding with the hosting organizations. Delegates
observed that what remains is the choice of the institution
to house the Mechanism, either IFAD or UNDP. Apparently,
the dilemma is the selection procedure, by vote or by
consensus. Many delegates felt this was an important matter
and stressed the need to not postpone the decision until
COP-2. Look for the two draft decisions on the GM.
THINGS TO LOOK FOR TODAY
PLENARY: Thirty-eight statements are expected during
morning and afternoon meetings of the High-Level Segment.
COW: The COW is expected to meet at 10:00 am to consider
the pending draft decisions.
|