|
Wednesday,
5 December
Delegates
met all day in three parallel thematic working groups. The Working Group
on Governance, Integrated Management and New Partnerships considered
infrastructure for the poor, allocation of water, and transboundary
waters. The Working Group on Mobilizing Financial Resources discussed
attracting investment, sustaining operations and investment, and the role
of development assistance, while the Working Group on Capacity Development
and Technology Transfer deliberated on sharing knowledge, effective
institutions, innovative technology for water efficiency, and coping
capacities for extreme events. Keynote speeches and case studies
introduced the subjects. The Ministerial declaration was informally
circulated to the Working Groups for consideration during discussion
|
|
The Working Group was co-chaired by Wu Jisong, China, and Rougatien
Biaou,
Benin, and facilitated by Josefina Maetsu, Spain. Rapporteur Aizaz
Chaudhry summarized the deliberations after each topic
Infrastructure
for the Poor:
Keynote
speaker Gourisankar Ghosh, Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative
Council, discussed the link between infrastructure development and poverty
alleviation, while Kalyan Ray, UNCHS, examined the challenge of providing
infrastructure for the urban poor. In the case studies, Mukami Kariuki,
World Bank, outlined the role of small-scale water providers in urban
Africa, while Oswald Chanda, Water Supply and Sanitation Council, Zambia,
shared Zambia’s experience with water reforms and Dennis Mwanza, Water
Utility Partnership, presented on water and sanitation reform.
|
|
|

Mukami Kariuki
|
They
recommended, inter alia: adopting a rights-based approach to basic
service provision; identifying innovative financial mechanisms; providing
enabling environments for small-scale service providers; taking a flexible
approach to reform; disseminating good information; and adapting
regulation to local conditions
|
|
Allocation
of Water: Frank Rijsberman, International Water Management Institute, discussed balancing water
allocation between uses, proposing knowledge centered cross-sectoral and
basin-level cross-sectoral dialogues that are informed by local action.
Peter Gleick, Pacific Institute, proposed, inter alia: prioritizing
basic and ecosystem needs; acknowledging, but treating water as more than
an economic good; reorienting water policy to demand; and reducing risk from
water-related conflicts
|

Rougatien
Biaou
|
|
The
issues raised during discussion include: the link between the ability of,
and willingness by, the poor to pay: the dilemma of assigning economic
value to water uses; the social, economic and spiritual values of water;
national sovereignty over freshwater; the relevance of trade regimes to
water; the risks of privatization; the need to review before the
Johannesburg Summit, private-public partnerships and private sector
performance in the water sector; consideration of the capacity for privatization
in developing countries; the cost of
non-provision of clean water; and the value of public sector success
stories
|
|

David
Grey
|

|
|

Transboundry
Waters:
David Grey, World Bank, emphasized, inter alia,
inclusiveness and subsidiarity, shared vision, fairness, the equal
importance of process and product, and the need for an instrument to
support the process
|
|

Josefina
Maetsu
|
|
Effective
Institutions:
Torkil Jonch-Clausen, Global Water Partnership, highlighted the roles of
water management institutions in policy formulation, education, water
allocation, and water quality management. He defined institutional
challenges as clarity of mandates, political acceptance, and strong
leadership. Ingvar Andersson, UNDP, presented a case study on capacity
building in African IWRM institutions. He highlighted challenges to
reforming management systems, inter alia, building capacity for new
roles, encouraging information flow, and reaching future decision makers
|
|

Overheads from the presentation
|
Sustaining
Operations and Investment:
Jon Gibbs,
PricewaterhouseCoopers, described means for structuring private sector
participation. He stressed that tariff raises without service improvements
are unviable, and that international finance institutions' involvement,
government preparation and targeted, time-bound subsidies are important.
He recommended progressing gradually from management contracts to
concessions, rather than sudden divestiture
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|

|
|
Pictures
from the Working group on Mobilizing Financial Resources
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
|

|
|
|

Mike Muller
|
Mike
Muller, South Africa, noted that with only 0.6 percent of its budget
invested in infrastructure, South Africa has halved those without water
access since 1994, through balancing cost recovery, donor assistance,
private sector expertise and domestic capital, under government
management. He noted, however, that the critical level of domestic
financing may not be available in poorer countries
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|
|
Finding
the way from Johannesburg to Kyoto...
|
|
Innovative
Technology for Water Efficiency: Co-chair Zuleta opened the
discussion by stating that developing countries require technology
transfer, not aid. In his keynote speech, Ralf Otterpohl, Institute of
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Management, demonstrated how low- and
high-tech water reuse technologies, based on separating grey-water from
sewage, can promote sanitation and reduce scarcity in developing and
developed countries. S. Rashid, NGO Forum for Drinking Water Supply and
Sanitation, presented a case study on community-based rainwater harvesting
in Bangladesh, concluding that interpersonal communication was most
effective for generating awareness
|

Claudia
Martinez Zuleta
|

John
Soussan
|
Coping
Capacities for Extreme Events: Zbigniew Kundzewicz, Potsdam Institute for Climate
Impact Research, gave an update of global and regional climate
variability, illustrated possible strategies for flood protection and
management, and underscored the need to improve forecasting to enhance
preparedness. In his presentation on helping water managers cope with
climate variability, Roberto Lenton, Columbia University, suggested
considering the full spectrum of climate events and not just extreme
events, adopting win-win strategies, improving mechanisms for
decision-making under uncertainty, and strengthening links between the water
management and climate communities. Chaiyuth Sukhsri, Mekong River
Commission, presented a case study on the holistic and coordinated
approach to managing the Mekong basin, and elaborated on strategies to
enhance services, address differences, facilitate dialogue, and build
capacity
|
|
Sharing
Knowledge: Co-chair Zuleta’s introductory remarks focused on
the value of sharing information at different levels and developing
indicators that are understandable to all. In his keynote presentation,
Arthur Askew, WMO, stressed the importance of collecting data to obtain
information, create knowledge and attain wisdom, which in turn can help
forecast problems, plan solutions, reach agreements and resolve conflicts.
Walter Jülich, International Association of Waterworks of the Rhine,
presented a case study on Rhine management, explaining how countries
overcame the obstacles of disparate cultures, attitudes and expectations
through compromise and consensus building
Listen to
Arthur Askew
|

Lars Engfeldt
|
|
In
ensuing discussions, participants emphasized: fostering empowerment at all
levels; transferring appropriate technology; promoting capacity
enhancement and retention; training young professionals; and rethinking
how knowledge is presented and used
Listen to
a part of the discussion
|

The International Congress Center, host to the International Conference on
Freshwater
|
|
|