|
The
International Conference on Sustainable Food Security for All by 2020
was held from 4-6 September 2001 at the International Congress Centre of
the Federal Parliament, Bonn, Germany. The conference was organized by
the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and its 2020
Vision Initiative, in collaboration with the German Federal Ministry for
Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through the German Foundation
for International Development (DSE-ZEL) in cooperation with the German
Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ-BEAF). It was supported by
cosponsors from civil society and the public and private sectors. Over
800 participants attended the meeting, including government ministers
and other senior officials, as well as representatives of academic and
research institutions, United Nations bodies, intergovernmental
organizations, business and industry, non-governmental organizations,
and the media.
The conference aimed to bring together key stakeholders to share their
knowledge, exchange information and ideas, and move toward a consensus
on identifying policies and actions needed to address the problem of
food insecurity in the most effective way, particularly in the light of
recent changes such as globalization, trade liberalization,
technological advances and environmental concerns.
Thursday,
6 September
Agnes Quisumbing, Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI chaired this session. She stated that empowering low-income women increases food security because women are critical to agricultural production, family nutrition and management of natural resources. Presenting key research findings, she indicated that increasing women’s incomes and capital generates improvements in education, child health, households and prospects for the next generation. While legal and institutional frameworks still need to be strengthened, she said efforts to empower women are succeeding. She then introduced the panelists, who each addressed one of the following issues in relation to empowering low-income women: education, agricultural
programmes, and property rights.
|
|

Elizabeth King
|
Elizabeth King,
Lead Economist, World Bank, stressed the importance of girls’ education
as a development goal and a strategic investment. She offered data showing
that gender gaps are often larger among the poorest income groups; poor
households bear the costs of gender inequality in education and limit
girls’ future opportunities; HIV infection rates are higher where gender
gaps in literacy are wider; and societies that discriminate on the basis
of gender suffer increased child mortality, poor health, and less
effective investments by women in their own and their children's education. Noting that gender
disparities persist due to societal institutions, economic policies and
control in household decision-making, she emphasized a strategy of
economic pricing policies that can increase demand for girls’ schooling
by reducing costs.
|
|

Ruth Meinzen-Dick |
Ruth
Meinzen-Dick, Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI, stressed that while women
are often responsible for food, property rights are usually held by men,
with women often being deprived of these rights. Noting that improved
access to property rights raises women’s
status and security, she added that it also increases investment in
children. Noting increasing devolution of resource management to
communities, she said this should involve women’s participation and be
sensitive to public perceptions. She concluded that investment in women's
groups can build long-term social capital.
|
|
Tunku
Abdul Aziz, Vice-Chairman of Transparency International, stressed that
good governance is the key to sustainable food security. He said
corruption deprives private sector development and discourages investment,
as it leads to decisions being taken that are contrary to the common good.
He stated that countries with weak institutions are particularly prone to
corruption and that such countries should be assisted in creating the
appropriate political and economic environment. He advocated exposing
corruption wherever possible and said corruption may be the “missing
factor in the equation” for many countries in seeking to achieve food
security.
|

Tunku Abdul Aziz
|
|

Charlotte McClain
|
Charlotte
McClain, Commissioner, Economic and Social Rights, South African Human
Rights Commission, highlighted the universal right to food safety as
formulated in the South African constitution and stressed the South
African Government’s obligation to ensure access to reliable supply of
food through appropriate policies and planning. She emphasized the need to
focus on vulnerable groups and the importance of good governance and
stable democracy.
|
|
Philippe Guiton,
Africa Relief Manager, World Vision, drew attention to the many conflicts
since the end of the Cold War, noting that 90% of conflict victims are
civilians. He said food insecurity can be both a consequence and cause of
conflict. Citing examples of countries – such as Sudan – that could
easily feed themselves but for ongoing conflict, he stressed that “food
security for all will remain a dream as long as conflict exists.” He
recommended that donors increase targeted assistance to poor countries
with strict conditions to avoid misappropriation, and that they develop
sensible long-term goals. He also recommended that donors, international
organizations, and non-governmental organizations incorporate conflict
prevention and mitigation into relief and development programmes.
Non-governmental organizations should constantly measure the impact of
their work on assisted populations to improve their programmes and help
avoid dependency on food aid. Finally, he urged the international
community to take action to “break the economy of war.”
|
Philippe Guiton
|
|
Grace
Akello, Minister of State for Entandikwa, Republic of Uganda, who
encouraged participants to participate in defining a common vision on
how to erase hunger from the world.
|
Grace Akello
|
|
Uschi Eid
|
Uschi
Eid, Parliamentary State Secretary to the German Federal Ministry for
Economic Cooperation and Development, said determining priorities requires
designating whose responsibility it is to end hunger. As input to the
panel discussion to follow, she hypothesized that food security demands
good governance, change in protectionist agricultural policies and
subsidized exports and a higher place on the public agenda.
|
|
Rajul
Pandya-Lorch, Head of IFPRI’s 2020 Vision Initiative, outlined a
draft paper produced by IFPRI that suggests the priority policy actions
required to achieve the 2020 Vision of a food-secure world for all. The
paper notes that much more needs to be done to achieve sustainable food
security for all. She then outlined seven broad areas the paper
recommends for high priority policy action: investing in human
resources; improving access to productive resources and remunerative
employment; improving markets, infrastructure, and institutions;
expanding appropriate research, knowledge, and technology; improving
natural resource management; promoting good governance; and supporting
sound national and international trade and macroeconomic policies. She
welcomed comments and feedback on the paper.
Listen
to the RealAudio
|

Rajul Pandya-Lorch
|
|
Keith
Bezanson challenged participants to set some priorities for action
to make sustainable food security a reality. He said the aim at this
conference should be to identify a few issues that are the top
priorities, which is necessary given scarce resources. He stated that
this meeting should not produce another declaration or statement, but
clear guidance for action.
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|

Joachim von Braun
|
Joachim
von Braun, Director of the Center for Development Research, ZEF-Bonn,
chaired this session. Noting that participants had expressed clear
priorities and offered many suggestions on how to organize action, he
called on them to explore who could best and most appropriately take
responsibility to end hunger.
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|

Robert Paarlberg
|
Robert
Paarlberg, Professor of Political Science, Wellesley College, and
Associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard
University, recalled the advice to “think globally, act locally,”
observing that circumstances of hunger often result from a breakdown of
local systems due to natural disasters or government failures. He said
this means it would be misleading to think globally about hunger, since
not all import and local prices are dependent on the world food market,
and international institutions have often failed in their efforts to
assist countries. Rather, he advocated thinking locally and acting
nationally, urging governments to take responsibility for financial
assistance and good governance.
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|
Klemens
van de Sand, Assistant President, Project Management Department of the
International Fund for
Agricultural Development, said national governments have the primary
responsibility for ending hunger by providing public goods. He suggested
that the reason why governments may not achieve this is a lack of
political will, which he said was more important than lack of resources or
capacity. Declaring that political will is generated by pressure from the
poor people affected by hunger, who have the need and will to seek change,
he said this group must be able to organize itself to secure its aims.
This requires a partnership based on a new approach to development policy
that focuses on restoring poor people’s dignity and rights. He said the
poor need to be empowered through local institutions serving their
interests, such as farmers associations, locally-based savings and credit
organizations, and self-employed women’s associations. Development
partners should help “enable the enablers” in achieving food security.
He urged participants to strongly request governments to incorporate food
security into the poverty reduction strategy agenda.
|
Klemens van de Sand
|
|

Ian Johnson
|
Ian
Johnson, Chair of the Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research and World Bank Vice President, said priorities
would differ among countries. In supporting greater visibility of food
security at the international level, he emphasized a focus on:
agricultural policies directed at poor people; economic growth and
agricultural yield productivity framed within the context of
environmental responsibility; new institutions and arrangements,
including a platform for discussion among all stakeholders on
biotechnology; increased investment in national and international
research; changes in subsidies, pricing policies and non-market
barriers.
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|

Stewart
Wallis
|
Stewart
Wallis, International Director, Oxfam GB, identified women’s
empowerment, trade reform and conflict as three areas especially
relevant to the work of Oxfam. On women’s empowerment, he highlighted
the need for this to be supported at all levels, particularly in the
area of girls’ education. On trade, He indicated that harnessing trade
for employment, income and food security meant making markets work by
reforming trade rules and creating a development agenda within market
liberalization efforts to protect the most vulnerable. In the area of
conflict, he stated that governments should be held accountable for
dealing and profiteering from small arms that promote violence.
Listen to
the RealAudio
|
|
Usha
Barwale Zehr, Joint Director of Research, Mahyco Seeds Co. Ltd.,
underscored the fundamental right to food and stressed the
responsibility of national governments to end hunger. She noted
differences in productivity within countries and stressed the need for
new types of partnerships to ensure food security. She further advocated
information on the causes of hunger to be made available at the local
level so local people can address hunger themselves.
|

Usha Barwale Zehr
|
|
Per
Pinstrup-Andersen, IFPRI Director General, presented his concluding remarks on the conference.
He recalled the conference’s three objectives and assessed its success. On the first objective of knowledge exchange, he indicated that this intensive meeting had been extremely
valuable. For the second aim of breaking the complacency, he noted none among participants either at the beginning or end of the meeting, while noting that the challenge was
to take this determination beyond this group. He observed that results of the third aim of catalyzing action remain to be seen, and that the group had to take action after the meeting.
Summarizing the discussions of the past three days, he noted agreement that efforts to attain food security for all by 2020 must be given a far higher priority, and said participants seem to agree that the lack of political will forms a major barrier to reform. He noted that some speakers had identified empowerment of the poor as advocates of their own interests as critical to building political momentum. Some participants had suggested that even with the best political will, lack of capacity was a significant factor.
He said the conference had made it clear that achieving the World Summit’s goal for 2015 and the 2020 Vision of food security for all by 2020 depended on three prerequisites: pro-poor economic growth; empowerment of poor; and the effective provision of public goods. Stating that the key aim is to bring people of poverty in any way possible, he noted that the fact that 75% of poor people live in rural areas means agriculture is an important factor.
Listen
to the RealAudio
|

Per Pinstrup-Andersen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |